Is The 1/6 Commission Coming?

#7,954
#7,954
just a rhetorical question - if the FBI had informants in on the planning of J6 (to the extent there was planning) don't they have a duty to stop "greatest threat to democracy" prior to it occurring? One is left to presume that 1) they didn't think it would be that serious and/or 2) the political value of letting it go was greater than the danger posed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, 825VOL, DC_Vol and 3 others
#7,955
#7,955
volinbham said:
just a rhetorical question - if the FBI had informants in on the planning of J6 (to the extent there was planning) don't they have a duty to stop "greatest threat to democracy" prior to it occurring? One is left to presume that 1) they didn't think it would be that serious and/or 2) the political value of letting it go was greater than the danger posed.
Click to expand...

I’ll take the and/or 2 for a 1000.
 
#7,956
#7,956
volinbham said:
just a rhetorical question - if the FBI had informants in on the planning of J6 (to the extent there was planning) don't they have a duty to stop "greatest threat to democracy" prior to it occurring? One is left to presume that 1) they didn't think it would be that serious and/or 2) the political value of letting it go was greater than the danger posed.
Click to expand...

Excellent questions. I would think they would have a duty to stop it from happening since legislatures lives were going to be put in danger
 
#7,958
#7,958
Trump attorney @AlinaHabba reveals Trump secretly hosted families of J6 political prisoners at Mar-a-Lago last night:

"Before he (Trump) started dinner last night, he stood up and he played that January 6th Orchestra song and we stood up and we said the National Anthem and we prayed for this country... he stood up, he shook their hands, he gave them hugs and he just keeps on fighting."

 
#7,959
#7,959
jmacvols1 said:
Trump attorney @AlinaHabba reveals Trump secretly hosted families of J6 political prisoners at Mar-a-Lago last night:

"Before he (Trump) started dinner last night, he stood up and he played that January 6th Orchestra song and we stood up and we said the National Anthem and we prayed for this country... he stood up, he shook their hands, he gave them hugs and he just keeps on fighting."

Click to expand...


We need a special counsel to investigate this. They’re obviously conspiring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, InVOLuntary, jmacvols1 and 1 other person
#7,966
#7,966
Revelation of FBI Informants Shakes Proud Boys’ January 6 Trial

Revelations of the sheer number of FBI informants involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot have shaken a trial of members of the Proud Boys in Washington, DC, as one FBI informant had infiltrated the defense team.

As Julie Kelly, who has covered the January 6 trials extensively, reports, there are at least ten informants now known to have been involved in the Proud Boys — more than twice the five defendants who are on trial.

One shocking revelation last week was that one FBI informant, Jen Loh, a member of Latinos for Trump, had been in close contact with the defendants and their legal team throughout the trial, potentially compromising their constitutional rights.

If the government had spied on discussions among the defendants and their lawyers by using an informant, that would violate the attorney-client privilege and the Sixth Amendment.

Revelation of FBI Informants Shakes Proud Boys' January 6 Trial
 
#7,967
#7,967
Franklin Pierce said:
Revelation of FBI Informants Shakes Proud Boys’ January 6 Trial

Revelations of the sheer number of FBI informants involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot have shaken a trial of members of the Proud Boys in Washington, DC, as one FBI informant had infiltrated the defense team.

As Julie Kelly, who has covered the January 6 trials extensively, reports, there are at least ten informants now known to have been involved in the Proud Boys — more than twice the five defendants who are on trial.

One shocking revelation last week was that one FBI informant, Jen Loh, a member of Latinos for Trump, had been in close contact with the defendants and their legal team throughout the trial, potentially compromising their constitutional rights.

If the government had spied on discussions among the defendants and their lawyers by using an informant, that would violate the attorney-client privilege and the Sixth Amendment.

Revelation of FBI Informants Shakes Proud Boys' January 6 Trial
Click to expand...

This revelation is more seditious to our nation and USC than anything at the Capitol that day. I would expect there to a trial for the organizers and perpetrators of this criminal activity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#7,968
#7,968
Trump ducks and weaves to avoid light being shined upon his conduct. Clearly, he has a lot to hide. It seems at least one of his spider holes is removed. Maybe, unless he is allowed to whittle another delay, exclusion, uncooperative, or some Republiar protective ploy is provided. Get the business done already. The mess is tiring enough as it is. At least one tried and true tenet is proven. If you have the money, you can get away with practically anything. Or avoid consequences until it all blows over for one reason or another. Duck and weave? Yeah, the man does know how to wiggle, eh? Hmmm. Wonder if Pence will be truthful, or too scared of Trumpians to do so?

Judge rejects Trump's privilege claims over Pence testimony in Jan. 6 probe
45.gif
 
#7,970
#7,970
WoodsmanVol said:
Trump ducks and weaves to avoid light being shined upon his conduct. Clearly, he has a lot to hide. It seems at least one of his spider holes is removed. Maybe, unless he is allowed to whittle another delay, exclusion, uncooperative, or some Republiar protective ploy is provided. Get the business done already. The mess is tiring enough as it is. At least one tried and true tenet is proven. If you have the money, you can get away with practically anything. Or avoid consequences until it all blows over for one reason or another. Duck and weave? Yeah, the man does know how to wiggle, eh? Hmmm. Wonder if Pence will be truthful, or too scared of Trumpians to do so?

Judge rejects Trump's privilege claims over Pence testimony in Jan. 6 probe
45.gif
Click to expand...

This is comedy. Your president made deals for kick backs through his son in China and Ukraine and who know what other countries. To post this crap shows how unaware some people are of their political surroundings.
 
#7,971
#7,971
scooty_vol said:
This is comedy. Your president made deals for kick backs through his son in China and Ukraine and who know what other countries. To post this crap shows how unaware some people are of their political surroundings.
Click to expand...

There it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1680030772841.png
 
#7,972
#7,972
WoodsmanVol said:
Trump ducks and weaves to avoid light being shined upon his conduct. Clearly, he has a lot to hide. It seems at least one of his spider holes is removed. Maybe, unless he is allowed to whittle another delay, exclusion, uncooperative, or some Republiar protective ploy is provided. Get the business done already. The mess is tiring enough as it is. At least one tried and true tenet is proven. If you have the money, you can get away with practically anything. Or avoid consequences until it all blows over for one reason or another. Duck and weave? Yeah, the man does know how to wiggle, eh? Hmmm. Wonder if Pence will be truthful, or too scared of Trumpians to do so?

Judge rejects Trump's privilege claims over Pence testimony in Jan. 6 probe
45.gif
Click to expand...

I know it may be a difficult concept to grasp but you actually have to have committed a crime before you should be charged with one much less convicted of it.

So far, in spite of all the bluster of the left, Trump has not been shown to have actually committed an action that is an actual crime (and I will admit, I am as surprised as anyone they haven't found something that actually has merit).

So it just shows the left's utter desperation (surprising since they are simply going to try to cheat their way to victory again) in trying to convict him on spurious charges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, Orangeburst and 82_VOL_83
#7,973
#7,973
Gandalf said:
I know it may be a difficult concept to grasp but you actually have to have committed a crime before you should be charged with one much less convicted of it.
So far, in spite of all the bluster of the left, Trump has not been shown to have actually committed an action that is an actual crime (and I will admit, I am as surprised as anyone they haven't found something that actually has merit).
So it just shows the left's utter desperation (surprising since they are simply going to try to cheat their way to victory again) in trying to convict him on spurious charges.
Click to expand...

Hard for you to grasp the essence of my post. Either that, or you're against former Vice-President Mike Pence testifying. And trying to hide it behind pretzeling.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top