bwyatt1
Pepe Silvia
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2007
- Messages
- 119
- Likes
- 0
Very true. The question is since Africans were sold into slavery by African and traded by Portugal, Spain etc don't they have some blame? If so how much?
I understand the question, but since the African countries of today were not established during the slave trade era, and Africa was mainly a land of tribes and colonies, I really don't see any of the African countries getting on board with paying reparations. Of course, I don't believe any nation should have to pay money to individuals for reparations, we should do all we can to improve inner-city education, life, etc.
Right there is your biggest problem!
Fair enough. Forget it.
i guess what i'm saying is that there is a lot of evidence out there to make a strong case about the type of people he would nominate for various positions and what ideas he has for America. i'm talking about ideas that go beyond his policies of taxes, economy and social issues.
George Will said the other day that the real fight behind the scene in presidential elections is that the president gets to pick about 3,000 people to work in Cabinet and sub-Cabinet level positions. These are the people that make sure the trains run on time. They are the ones who truly shape the day-to-day interaction of government and citizenry.
I take from that a couple of things. First, obviously neither McCain nor Obama can sit there and actually parse through applicants for 3,000 jobs. Those things are done by staff. Both have staffs made up of seasoned Washington insider politicos. The reality is that neither McCain nor Obama would go all that far off the reservation in who actually works in these jobs.
Second, I am sure that the further away you get from the center of power, the less ideological the worker. That is to say, some analyst brought in by either McCain or Obama to work on famr subsidies isn't going to care nearly as much about party status as would, say, an actual Cabinet member. Yet, its those lower level folks that make most of the decisions affecting you and I on a daily basis.
Last, neither McCain nor Obama strikes me as an ideologue, anyway. The interesting thing is that, since the nominations, Obama has drifted away from the left, more towards the center. McCain, on the other hand, has moved to the right, trying to motivate and energize the base of his party. Its just election politics and, at the end of the day, neither one of them wants to do harm to the country and neither can wave a magic wand and cause all 3,000 of his appointees to make us socialist or fascist.
It just doesn't work that way.
i guess what i'm saying is that there is a lot of evidence out there to make a strong case about the type of people he would nominate for various positions and what ideas he has for America. i'm talking about ideas that go beyond his policies of taxes, economy and social issues.
i understand what your saying, i'm talking more about the people who would be in positions that have a great deal of influence on things like foreign policy, the economy, education, etc... it only takes a couple of people to change policy or creat laws that would effect millions, maybe not instantly but in 5-10 years. we seen examples in our energy policy and education
you never answered me in the other thread when I asked, name some of these people that he would nominate for various positions. I don't think you can come up with anything damning or you would have answered me the first time.
you never answered me in the other thread when I asked, name some of these people that he would nominate for various positions. I don't think you can come up with anything damning or you would have answered me the first time.
I cannot imagine extremists like Rev. Wright having an actual voice in policy-making. I just don't think that would ever happen, whether its McCain or Obama.