TennTradition
Defended.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Messages
- 16,919
- Likes
- 822
I'm not a fan of Pollard being set free, but I have pretty strict views on traitors.
Thanks for the congrats - she's at 38 weeks now...so we're definitely getting close. Congrats on the upcoming grandchild!
As for you assessment of current energy policy:
- We're wasting our time with corn ethanol. I won't disagree at all. Ethanol may work in certain areas for certain purposes. But, it's not straightforward. Any time you divert land use to produce fuel, you may suffer certain negative consequences that you have to factor in to the overall "cost" of that decision. The CO2 balance depends very much on how you are making the ethanol (corn vs. sugar cane, etc.), but in the case of corn ethanol, it just isn't worth it (whether you think AGW is an issue or not).
- I am personally in favor of continuing to develop solar/wind/alternatives, but you can't force it in the wrong situations and there is no way you can argue these technologies are ready for primetime. But, we live in a resource-constrained world and these technologies will have a place in time. Investment now makes sense..I don't think of it as money thrown away if it helps these technologies move closer to meeting future energy needs.
- As for coal, it's a tough one. If one doesn't accept the premise of AGW, then one will never agree that coal should be phased out. There's no other way to slice it. Coal can be scrubbed to be "clean" outside of CO2 ... and if one doesn't see a problem with the higher CO2 that coal produces relative to other fuels, then one is never going to think that coal is a problem.
- I think that combined cycle natural gas plants have a huge role in future of energy production in this country, particularly considering the gas reserves we are discovering.
Thanks for the congrats - she's at 38 weeks now...so we're definitely getting close. Congrats on the upcoming grandchild!
As for you assessment of current energy policy:
- We're wasting our time with corn ethanol. I won't disagree at all. Ethanol may work in certain areas for certain purposes. But, it's not straightforward. Any time you divert land use to produce fuel, you may suffer certain negative consequences that you have to factor in to the overall "cost" of that decision. The CO2 balance depends very much on how you are making the ethanol (corn vs. sugar cane, etc.), but in the case of corn ethanol, it just isn't worth it (whether you think AGW is an issue or not).
- I am personally in favor of continuing to develop solar/wind/alternatives, but you can't force it in the wrong situations and there is no way you can argue these technologies are ready for primetime. But, we live in a resource-constrained world and these technologies will have a place in time. Investment now makes sense..I don't think of it as money thrown away if it helps these technologies move closer to meeting future energy needs.
- As for coal, it's a tough one. If one doesn't accept the premise of AGW, then one will never agree that coal should be phased out. There's no other way to slice it. Coal can be scrubbed to be "clean" outside of CO2 ... and if one doesn't see a problem with the higher CO2 that coal produces relative to other fuels, then one is never going to think that coal is a problem.
- I think that combined cycle natural gas plants have a huge role in future of energy production in this country, particularly considering the gas reserves we are discovering.