Israel to Expand Settlements in West Bank

#2
#2
Hopefully the Israeli people wipe out the Palestinians! Maybe that will give our elected officials the go ahead to destroy Islam.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3
#3
"Israel is a democracy that observes the law, and as prime minister I am obligated to preserve the law and preserve the settlements, and I say here that there is no contradiction between the two," Mr Netanyahu said.

lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6
#6
Hopefully the Israeli people wipe out the Palestinians! Maybe that will give our elected officials the go ahead to destroy Islam.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I can never tell if you're serious or just effing around.
 
#8
#8
Israel is stupid.... They bring a lot of that crap on themselves.

They have every right to populate Judea and Samaria, I don't even understand why we even call it the west bank, maybe you care to explain that to me?





Great plan: things aren't farked up enough here, let's make them worse.

How does this make anything worse?






Exhibit one million of why Israel is a piece of **** ally.

Exibit one million one that you are as clueless as one small rock in a big box of rocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#18
#18
Israel doesn't admit to having them either.
(Or at least didn't, I haven't checked in a while )

Not sure why it matters whether or not Israel has nuclear weapons (which they do); what matters is that golfball seems to imply that Israel can do what they want with their country. So, why is it that North Korea and Iran cannot do what they want (build nuclear weapons) with their country?

I do find it odd that some of the most fervent gun-ownership advocates are also fervently against allowing sovereign nations to own whatever weapons they like; while, on the other side of the spectrum, the most fervent gun-control advocates are usually indifferent to whether or not other countries want to arm themselves with nuclear weapons. I do not see how either group reconciles those views.

As for the "Israel can do what they want", while NK and Iran cannot because "they are our enemies", well we can certainly insure that they will continue to remain our enemies by treating them like second-class nations.
 
#19
#19
For the amount of money we pour into that country we could set up another country and move all those settlers there. But no, they're going to continue to fight over little scraps of wasteland.

Makes sense.
 
#20
#20
For the amount of money we pour into that country we could set up another country and move all those settlers there. But no, they're going to continue to fight over little scraps of wasteland.

Makes sense.

They must rebuild the Temple to bring the Sanhedrin back and end the diaspora; only then can they hope for the coming of their Messiah.

This is what most people miss in the West; the main end of the Zionist movement entails destroying the Dome of the Rock. Both that end and the objection to that end are completely irrational, but the passions runs so high in orthodox religion that neither side will just say screw it and let the other side have that stupid rock that is the temple mount.
 
#21
#21
Not sure why it matters whether or not Israel has nuclear weapons (which they do); what matters is that golfball seems to imply that Israel can do what they want with their country. So, why is it that North Korea and Iran cannot do what they want (build nuclear weapons) with their country?i

I do find it odd that some of the most fervent gun-ownership advocates are also fervently against allowing sovereign nations to own whatever weapons they like; while, on the other side of the spectrum, the most fervent gun-control advocates are usually indifferent to whether or not other countries want to arm themselves with nuclear weapons. I do not see how either group reconciles those views.

As for the "Israel can do what they want", while NK and Iran cannot because "they are our enemies", well we can certainly insure that they will continue to remain our enemies by treating them like second-class nations.

My bad. Misinterpreted your angle.
as you were
 
#22
#22
They have every right to populate Judea and Samaria, I don't even understand why we even call it the west bank, maybe you care to explain that to me?







How does this make anything worse?








Exibit one million one that you are as clueless as one small rock in a big box of rocks.

Without pictures and copy and pasted garbage, explain to me, In your own words, why Israel is valuable to us. I'll wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#24
#24
Not sure why it matters whether or not Israel has nuclear weapons (which they do); what matters is that golfball seems to imply that Israel can do what they want with their country. So, why is it that North Korea and Iran cannot do what they want (build nuclear weapons) with their country?

I do find it odd that some of the most fervent gun-ownership advocates are also fervently against allowing sovereign nations to own whatever weapons they like; while, on the other side of the spectrum, the most fervent gun-control advocates are usually indifferent to whether or not other countries want to arm themselves with nuclear weapons. I do not see how either group reconciles those views.

As for the "Israel can do what they want", while NK and Iran cannot because "they are our enemies", well we can certainly insure that they will continue to remain our enemies by treating them like second-class nations.

They are second class nations with crack pot dictators (or commities). Both have sworn to attack friendly nations. Now the PRK isn't going to do much, not about religion, Iran and their mullahs just might.
 
#25
#25
They are second class nations with crack pot dictators (or commities). Both have sworn to attack friendly nations. Now the PRK isn't going to do much, not about religion, Iran and their mullahs just might.

Haven't we, and our allies, sworn to attack them, as well? Didn't we actually overthrow the Prime Minister of Iran at one point?

So, we have not only made threats (and continue to make threats: see Bush axis-of-evil comments) against these nations, but we have actually acted on those threats in an official capacity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top