Israel vs Palestinians

#21,476
#21,476

this man and his son has caused so much division and strife in this nation. They are obviously hands off due to Dem donorship.

nypost.com

Soros and other elites are funding the campus agitators stoking anti-Israel, antisemitic protests

The Post has learned that left-leaning philanthropist George Soros and other left elites are funding the student radicals who are fueling the nationwide explosion of Israel-hating protests.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlipKidVol and Cod
#21,480
#21,480
lawgator1 said:
This photo proves my point. These folks are more concerned with videoing themselves and their friends being conscientious protestors and "look at me!" than actually displaying or speaking any message.

I have no doubt that some sympathetic to the situation in Gaza started protesting in heartfelt, real, concern. And I am sure some antisemitic agitators jumped on board. But then it got out of control with people just wanting to be part of the melee. And so now its sporty to be a protestor.
Click to expand...
The mob is fickle.
I think you’re right. The protesters will go away long before this war does.
 
#21,484
#21,484
Vol737 said:
Mental illness? Maybe, or just a very warped view and completely unaware.
Click to expand...
I think a lot people are looking for acceptance anywhere that they can find it bc they probably had absentee parents or something along those lines where they had very little guidance. There are those out there that recognize who these people are, what they look like, what makes them tick and then cast them as useful idiots in their game of unrest and chaos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737
#21,485
#21,485
NashVol11 said:
You mean like when you told me that unsourced “legal precedent” said globalize the intifada = chanting for genocide and then your description of the “precedent” had nothing to do with that? That kind of intentional misrepresentation? Alright
Click to expand...
Repeating the shy is green doesn’t change reality.

I ask questions for clarification when you say things.
You don’t. In fact you prescribe false motions to people you disagree with to explain to yourself why they don’t agree with you.
You have no interest in understanding what people different than you think.
 
#21,489
#21,489
Orangeslice13 said:
Repeating the shy is green doesn’t change reality.

I ask questions for clarification when you say things.
You don’t. In fact you prescribe false motions to people you disagree with to explain to yourself why they don’t agree with you.
You have no interest in understanding what people different than you think.
Click to expand...
I’ve asked you to explain why you said “legal precedent” dictates that globalize the intifada = chanting for genocide, especially when your description of it had nothing to do with that, and you won’t answer. I asked you where the “legal precedent” came from and asked for a link to the actual text instead of your clearly inaccurate paraphrasing and that question will apparently continue to go unanswered as well.

So spare me the BS and projection, I showed you specifically where “one solution” has been in protests for years and instead of “understanding what people different than you think” you just said they’re all like Nazis, while still avoiding all of the questions above
 
#21,492
#21,492
NashVol11 said:
I’ve asked you to explain why you said “legal precedent”
Click to expand...
I’m done explaining things to you 20 times. It’s like when some goober claims I didn’t answer them and it turns out to be something I openly said repeatedly.
You get one answer. And one clarification. Beyond that it’s up to you to figure out.
 
#21,493
#21,493
Orangeslice13 said:
I’m done explaining things to you 20 times. It’s like when some goober claims I didn’t answer them and it turns out to be something I openly said repeatedly.
You get one answer. And one clarification. Beyond that it’s up to you to figure out.
Click to expand...
So far I’ve gotten non-answers and nothing else, because there is no answer. You are doing the thing you complain about Eastern doing, except without the previous explanation
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#21,494
#21,494
85SugarVol said:
Yea, apparently the rights of Israeli citizens are reserved to citizens of Israel.

Rights that the roughly 2M Palestinian citizens of Israel enjoy.

Are you saying Palestinian citizens of Israel cannot lease land in Israel?
Click to expand...
Had you really missed what the assertions of Apartheid were about? I thought you were keeping up.
It's difficult for Palestinian citizens of Israel to lease land. Which is ironic considering where Israel got the land.
 
#21,496
#21,496
The anti war protests of the late 60’s pushed the electorate to elect Nixon in 1968 and 1972. After the radical left took over the Democrat party in 1968, the Dems held the White House for only a single 4 year term between 1968 and 1992.
The left is playing with fire here. If they are not careful they are going to get Trump followed by a whole string of Republican presidents for years and years to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HammondB3Vol
#21,497
#21,497
Orangeslice13 said:
You get one answer. And one clarification. Beyond that it’s up to you to figure out.
Click to expand...
What case is the “legal precedent” from and can you provide a link to the actual text? Looking forward to the next method of non-answering for a question you’ve never remotely addressed
 
#21,498
#21,498
McDad said:
Bit of a faux pas on their chant in the video. "The people, united, will never be defeated". Guess it's too much for them to use "divided" instead of "defeated". Maybe I am expecting too much of the simple-minded bigots.
Click to expand...
That would be a dumber and more redundant chant, given that united already means “not divided”
 
#21,500
#21,500
Of course the people, united, won’t be divided. If they were divided they wouldn’t be “the people, united” anymore
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top