(1) Correct... and they gave up 38 and 41 points to those teams respectively, with both games being relatively early in the season so their starters were likely pulled long before the end of the game. Just look at the rest of their schedule and you can see what their real defense looked like (e.g. they gave up 34 points to Troy and 31 to Memphis).
(2) Yep... an offense that scored 7 points against Memphis and also 7 points against the mighty Louisiana Ragin Cajuns.
Nothing personal... but my psycho babble research would suggest that your analysis needs a little more work. You can't just look at "averages" and make broad assumptions without factoring in other criteria.
I hope it was from accurate sites because I went to a lot of different ones. They have 8 returning starters on a defense that was ranked 51st in total and that is with Auburn and Missouri on their schedule. The offense has 4 starters returning from an offense that was ranked 23rd in total, which includes a dual threat qb and the best rb and wr in the league returning. They lost a lot of starting offensive lineman but the replacements are comparable to ours in size. One ol is a little small in today's standards at 274. The coaching carousel has connections with 2 hc in the sec. That might help in some preparation by getting a little inside info on us.
I'm not saying that we won't win, but we could be in for a better fight than most are expecting. Couple that with our young team thinking all we have to do is show up and win could spell disaster. I think if we stick with the run we could wear them down on the defensive line due to the fact that the seconds on the depth chart are all freshmen. This info has tempered my enthusiasm some. I predict a 32 to 22 win for us. I hope it's more but I'm not predicting more than a ten point victory for us.
If anyone wants to do their own research feel free to enlighten me why I'm wrong. (Minus all the psycho babble that has no basis in facts)
Lighten up peanut. No need in getting your panties in a wad. I was referring to someone coming on here and saying bs. You did some good research. Too bad you turned into a turd at the end of it.
Lighten up peanut. No need in getting your panties in a wad. I was referring to someone coming on here and saying bs. You did some good research. Too bad you turned into a turd at the end of it.
No panties wadded roddo. I was simply trying to convey that some of your own "analysis" would more closely align with the "psycho babble" bs that you didn't want back from other posters. I did not mean it as a personal attack, but you surely understand that this is a message board and people are going to post whatever they choose... and your original OP somewhat invited this type of response. :hi:
Well we had a good thread going until this sidetrack. You are wrong but I'm not gonna get in a pissing contest with you. All of the things I said in my post were facts. My reasonings were based upon those facts. Thus, not psycho babble. I put that last part in to try and avoid the vol posters that call into the Feinbaum show and say we are going to the playoffs and when asked why, they respond with "cause Butch has got the team fired up". The whole thread was going great until "the derailers" show up. Y'all travel in packs I think. I also started this thread because I thought we needed a little more info about ark state than was being posted. Hoped it would generate those kinds of conversations.
I would like to inform you about your future posts as well. When anyone starts a sentence with "nothing personal", it's usually gonna be taken personally.
To be fair, you did the exact same thing. You filled the entirety of the latter half of your post with psycho babble that has no basis in fact, then told people not to bother you with such. And for the record, "do your own research" and "enlighten me" just reeks with self defensive sarcasm that invites negative responses--especially when your guilty of exactly what you're accusing potential responders of doing.
Just a couple of thoughts for future posts...
:hi:
OK. Thanks for your wonderful insight and contribution.:ermm:
What gets me is why fans think every team that wins one week is making a conscious decision to think they're going to go into the next game with a cake walk mentality. Anybody that listens to CBJ knows thats not going to happen. Butch Is the Dr Phil of the mental game. It aint happening but fans throw that out anyway. Second thing is all off season we heard that we were on upset alert and would lose the USt game and we stomped a mudhole in virtually every analyst pick. Now we play a similar team and lose faith that this team cant stomp another mudhole in the next opponent who by the way we play at home. Oh ye of little faith. In bUTch i trust that he knows what the he@# he's doing with this "coaching" thing. (Thats my psychobabble)
If we only win by 10 points then we might as well forfeit to OU.I hope it was from accurate sites because I went to a lot of different ones. They have 8 returning starters on a defense that was ranked 51st in total and that is with Auburn and Missouri on their schedule. The offense has 4 starters returning from an offense that was ranked 23rd in total, which includes a dual threat qb and the best rb and wr in the league returning. They lost a lot of starting offensive lineman but the replacements are comparable to ours in size. One ol is a little small in today's standards at 274. The coaching carousel has connections with 2 hc in the sec. That might help in some preparation by getting a little inside info on us.
I'm not saying that we won't win, but we could be in for a better fight than most are expecting. Couple that with our young team thinking all we have to do is show up and win could spell disaster. I think if we stick with the run we could wear them down on the defensive line due to the fact that the seconds on the depth chart are all freshmen. This info has tempered my enthusiasm some. I predict a 32 to 22 win for us. I hope it's more but I'm not predicting more than a ten point victory for us.
If anyone wants to do their own research feel free to enlighten me why I'm wrong. (Minus all the psycho babble that has no basis in facts)