I mean, Tennessee under Warlick still won about 75% of their games and recruited pretty well most years. It wasn't Pat Summitt but it also wasn't a disaster. It just never improved, unfortunately. And that's not an unlikely scenario for UConn, either. I think, in the end, they will decline much as Tennessee did. It is inevitable. When you're always at the top, where else can you go? And the UConn athletic department is already hard pressed to cover their budget; they run perilously in the red most years, from what I recall. That means they will look first to cost effective coaching choices within their own tree. I say this not to antagonzie any UConn fans visiting here for the game week banter, either. That's just how athletic departments seem to operate. When in doubt, find the choice that best maximizes fan engagement and revenue while minimizing cost and risk. They'll make a safe choice before a risky one.
But even if they did decide to splurge or spend big to bring a big name, there's still no guarantees. It's virtually impossible to replace the respect and motivation that comes from a legendary coach, whether they're encouraging you or demanding more from you. I suppose they could try to NIL their way to keeping a stranglehold on recruiting, but how far will that carry them, I wonder? Coaching really does stir the drink at any level of talent. It can be the difference between Final Fours and Elite Eights. As we've learned ourselves.