lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,921
- Likes
- 43,011
like you and Trump? you still believe multiple things about Trump that have been disproven.Why is there is such an insatiable hunger on the MAGA right to believe that facts are not facts? It feels like the hope is that if they can show that anything the government has ever said was wrong, then they can use that to contend that other things they don't like, even if true, are also wrong.
That was the cornerstone of trumpism from the very beginning.Why is there is such an insatiable hunger on the MAGA right to believe that facts are not facts? It feels like the hope is that if they can show that anything the government has ever said was wrong, then they can use that to contend that other things they don't like, even if true, are also wrong.
Why is there is such an insatiable hunger on the MAGA right to believe that facts are not facts? It feels like the hope is that if they can show that anything the government has ever said was wrong, then they can use that to contend that other things they don't like, even if true, are also wrong.
It feels like the hope is that if they can show that anything the government has ever said was wrong,
That was the cornerstone of trumpism from the very beginning.
Everything relied upon the complete blurring of fact and fiction........in essence, dumbing down.
Are you serious?What are you talking about, this has nothing really to do with Trump?
Have you considered going to the doctor and talking about these problems you have?
Are you serious?
MAGA has nothing to do with trumpism?
Sorry, but once again, you are wrong.
Have you considered taking a reading comprehension course?
My response was to lawgator and related specifically to that post.You are in a topic and screaming about trump, what does trump have to do with this?
You're seriously mentality ill.
Are you ever going to talk about an actual topic?
My response was to lawgator and related specifically to that post.
And I'm constantly looking for topics of interest that are actually being discussed in a beneficial manner.
That was the cornerstone of trumpism from the very beginning.
Everything relied upon the complete blurring of fact and fiction........in essence, dumbing down.
And what part of the discussion has been beneficial?Are you?
Even LG's comments are completely off topic, meaning he not doesn't what people might have issues or the why in context.
The people that voted for Trump are pissed, which is the irony of this. Trump isn't really the source of the problem in this, although its not a good look that she has done this... and its his appointment. The actual topic is really beyond whether Trump is the President or if people voted for him. Now some of us have mentioned it, of course, but its the context of the discussion.
None of this has any context to the topic even in a round about way.... its mental rant.
The people that you say would never challenge Trump, are actually the ones pissed off. The rest of you aren't? Why not? You should be, apparently there 250+ victims and nobody knows anything.
And what part of the discussion has been beneficial?
I'll wait and see what she releases, when, and how.
It's certainly easy enough.
To control....
Not to teach you......teaching you anything borders on the impossible.
you trust this gov't to give you absolute facts???Why is there is such an insatiable hunger on the MAGA right to believe that facts are not facts? It feels like the hope is that if they can show that anything the government has ever said was wrong, then they can use that to contend that other things they don't like, even if true, are also wrong.
Do you believe there should be justice for the 250+ victims???? Clinton for instance was named as on the island and witnesses says he had sex with minors.... If the FBI is sitting on that why??? Why protect these people?Why is there is such an insatiable hunger on the MAGA right to believe that facts are not facts? It feels like the hope is that if they can show that anything the government has ever said was wrong, then they can use that to contend that other things they don't like, even if true, are also wrong.
There obviously is a list. Maxwell was convicted of trafficking underage girls to....? He was big in finance back in the day, he's going to have contacts, but who were the kids trafficked to? That's the list people want and I doubt the public will ever find out.I'm going to agree with the reporter here
Julie K. Brown, the award-winning Miami Herald journalist known for her investigations into Epstein and his associates, asserted: “There is no Jeffrey Epstein client list. Period. It’s a figment of the internet’s imagination—and a means to just slander people.”
Brown noted that many of the names of people tied to Epstein are already known. “This list has been public since 2015. All one has to do is Google it,” she said in one post. “Epstein’s black book was public so long ago that it’s even on Amazon,” she said in another.
I'm going to agree with the reporter here
Julie K. Brown, the award-winning Miami Herald journalist known for her investigations into Epstein and his associates, asserted: “There is no Jeffrey Epstein client list. Period. It’s a figment of the internet’s imagination—and a means to just slander people.”
Brown noted that many of the names of people tied to Epstein are already known. “This list has been public since 2015. All one has to do is Google it,” she said in one post. “Epstein’s black book was public so long ago that it’s even on Amazon,” she said in another.
Deflecting to being "blocked" is the worst part. You have a group like DOGE that is using ML to get into files and documents everywhere. Turn them loose on this thing if you're being "blocked" by your own damn agency. It's an excuse, and it's pathetic.Anything that implicated anyone with any real power has long been deleted from history imo. I'm not sure what they actually expected to get at this point but they made it worse for themselves by promising things that they weren't sure even existed. Now they're claiming they have evidence to put people in jail but the stuff they're releasing is old news and nothing that could convict anyone. People are rightfully upset that this doesn't come close to what was promised.