6-4-3
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 1,049
- Likes
- 2,138
So are Vandy and Virginia the other worthwhile baseball schools?
What about Texas Tech or Florida or LSU or A&M or Oregon State or Louisville or South Carolina or Southern Miss or Mississippi State or Arizona or Ole Miss?
They managed to overcome whatever scholarship issues everyone seems to think is holding UT back.
Why are Miami and Rice and USC garbage now?
They don't have the $ limitations.
Why is Stanford so hot-and-cold?
So are Vandy and Virginia the other worthwhile baseball schools?
What about Texas Tech or Florida or LSU or A&M or Oregon State or Louisville or South Carolina or Southern Miss or Mississippi State or Arizona or Ole Miss?
They managed to overcome whatever scholarship issues everyone seems to think is holding UT back.
Why are Miami and Rice and USC garbage now?
They don't have the $ limitations.
Why is Stanford so hot-and-cold?
It 110% is the reason Vandy won a title.
They've invested a ton of resources into their program and have a top 5 head coach. Those probably helped them out too. We should consider doing the same.
Anyways, I'm more concerned with why we can't turn it around rather than why Vanderbilt has won more games than any program in college baseball over the past decade.
David Price and other former Vanderbilt players made a $12 million gift for a new baseball facility. When is our AD going to ask for gifts from Helton, RA, Arencebia, etc.? We have guys making money playing ball. Let's put some money into this crap and get it fixed.
It 110% is the reason Vandy won a title.
I would look into why Georgia isn't a consistent regional team first.
They are set up better than UT (and most of the rest of the country to be honest) and never seem to have any sustained success.
The scholarship situation is laughable when you have 3 public schools in the poorest state in the country having sustained success over DECADES.
Private schools absolutely do have an advantage, but it's so overblown it barely deserves any attention.
Why haven't you mentioned anything about USC? A historically great private school that is no longer a good program.
Miami? They get owned by the in state public schools almost every season.
I can't tell you why Serrano isn't working out, but I can tell you that it has nothing to do with this idiotic scholarship conversation.
You clearly lack an understanding in the importance of in state talent, in and out of state tuition cost and how % apply to baseball scholarships. The only thing idiotic is your rambling on a subject you have little aptitude for.
And I think you underestimate the amount of talent in Tennessee. There is plenty enough talent for UT to get equally as good instate players as Vandy gets.
Do you know how many players from East Tennessee went in the first round of the draft last year?
South Carolina has a population of roughly 5 million, while Tennessee is at roughly 6.5 million. South Carolina's population base can support not just two perennial top 15 programs in USCe and Clemson, but the defending CWS champion just also happens to be in that state, too.
So, if almost a third less population can help sustain 3 major programs, along with some solid mid majors, then why can't Tennessee's population help supply 2 major SEC programs, along with its mid majors?
There is plenty of talent in Tennessee. The current UT coaching staff has simply mis-evaluated and ignored much of it.
I feel like every single time we debate this topic it always comes back to Vanderbilt. Let's toss Vandy out of the equation for a minute. Why are the other 10 teams ahead of us in the conference every year kicking our butts?
They all whip us in recruiting and on the field. So, bingo, we have a coach problem and a facility problem. The other 10 coaches are finding ways to get kids on campus, working through the money/draft issues, and winning baseball games. Let's find one of those guys. Seriously, in this conference, just finishing in the top 8 or 9 gets you in the NCAAT. I'm not asking for Omaha right away, I'm asking to be 8th or 9th in the SEC at least 2 or 3 times in 6 years.
So, if Vandy gives everybody full rides, as many have claimed, why did Dansby Swanson come out of Vandy with huge student loan debt? That's been documented.
Maybe the reason Vandy won a title is because they evaluated and recruited well and have a tremendous coaching staff?
Tired of hearing excuses. The current coach has a conference wining percentage lower than Todd Raleigh's was. There is just no way keeping him can be justified.
To be fair, I don't know that it's certain that Dansby had "huge" student loan debt. But it was documented that he had to take out student loans to attend.
The idea of 30 "full-rides" is likely a myth, and the fact that some coaches toss numbers out in a hyperbolic way is not gospel truth.
It's an advantage. Like Rucker said, it's one time in one sport where Vanderbilt has an advantage as opposed to extreme disadvantages as they have in some other sports. But I'd agree with many on here that it's overblown.
I know at least one Vandy fan has mentioned that Hunter Martin was recruited by Vandy but chose U.T. So it's not true that Vandy just keeps all the in-state kids for themselves. Your current staff is also proof of that, as we could sure use some arms like Stallings and Lingenfelter.
Missing on Crowe and the kid that went to miss state was bad but getting Lingo is a sign that is changing with the new assistant coaches that do the recruiting.
But to your overall point the talent is much much much less than Georgia or Florida.
The South Carolina schools are making hay in Georgia.