John Brennan

#77
#77
TN Ribs said:
This is the default response by Trumpkins when they respond to a post that they know is 100% accurate. It's very prevalent in this forum.
Their defensive mechanism goes into over-drive, we all know they're the ones with the hurt feelings - it's painfully obvious and very amusing.
Click to expand...
What in your post was accurate?
 
#78
#78
Septic said:
Should he lose it because he's been critical of Captain Thinskin?

Dotard is simply being vindictive and It's a dangerous precedent.
Click to expand...
Brennan called the President treasonous on television. Nobody should be allowed security clearance if they are going to get on tv and make statements like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13, SpaceCoastVol, AirVol and 2 others
#82
#82
s
1972 Grad said:
Brennan called the President treasonous on television. Nobody should be allowed security clearance if they are going to get on tv and make statements like that.
Click to expand...

I don't think being perceived as a nice guy should be a factor in deciding who is competent enough to hold security clearances.
 
#84
#84
Septic said:
s

I don't think being perceived as a nice guy should be a factor in deciding who is competent enough to hold security clearances.
Click to expand...

I don’t think it should be either. I think it should come down to whether they need to have access to classified information in the current or future time frame. Since all of the people in question in addition to Brennan’s getting yanked today are likely to not be requested to aid the admin (that’s an understatement and you know it) they ALL should have their clearances as a minimum deactivated and in cases where it’s shown they’ve abused the classified material handling requirements (Comey, Clapper, Brennan, McCabe) they should be revoked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#88
#88
TN Ribs said:
More pettiness by the infant in the White House. He only sees people through a lens that either support him unconditionally vs. those that are critical of him. It's that black and white - there is no nuance with orange knucklehead. He continues to divide instead of unite. The funny thing is that Brennan will still be critical of him, he doesn't need Intel Briefings to articulate this disaster of an Administration.
Click to expand...
Remember when the IRS targeted conservatives? I member....
 
  • Like
Reactions: T-TownVol, Obsessed, Matt2496 and 2 others
#89
#89
TN Ribs said:
More pettiness by the infant in the White House. He only sees people through a lens that either support him unconditionally vs. those that are critical of him. It's that black and white - there is no nuance with orange knucklehead. He continues to divide instead of unite. The funny thing is that Brennan will still be critical of him, he doesn't need Intel Briefings to articulate this disaster of an Administration.
Click to expand...
Nope. All he needs is a microphone and a camera, and CNN is more than happy to provide both.
 
#96
#96
Septic said:
They're all political hacks.
Click to expand...
Don’t disagree. However the problem here is Brennan was in an apolitical intelligence chief role.

I got no problem with a politician being a political hack. I expect it. I have huge problems with intelligence heads being political.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jacdaniels
#97
#97
NorthDallas40 said:
Don’t disagree. However the problem here is Brennan was in an apolitical intelligence chief role.

I got no problem with a politician being a political hack. I expect it. I have huge problems with intelligence heads being political.
Click to expand...

Was... in an apolitical role is right. Now, this is nothing but vindictive behavior by a thin-skinned president.

If you want to make the argument security clearances shouldn't be had after people leave the .gov then fine, but please stop pretending this is isn't what we all know it is.
 
Last edited:
#98
#98
Septic said:
Was... in an apolitical role is right. Now, this is nothing but vindictive behavior by a thin-skinned president.

If you want to make the argument security clearances shouldn't be had after people leave the .gov then fine, but please stop pretending this is isn't what we all know it is.
Click to expand...

Oh BS he has been behaving politically for years. And they don’t need clearances I their roles. This is karma and will be on Clapper Yates and Hayden too I believe Comey and McCabe are at least deactivated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jacdaniels
#99
#99
TN Ribs said:
More pettiness by the infant in the White House. He only sees people through a lens that either support him unconditionally vs. those that are critical of him. It's that black and white - there is no nuance with orange knucklehead. He continues to divide instead of unite. The funny thing is that Brennan will still be critical of him, he doesn't need Intel Briefings to articulate this disaster of an Administration.
Click to expand...
Still blinded by liberal stupidity I see
 
  • Like
Reactions: jacdaniels, SpaceCoastVol and W.TN.Orange Blood
#100
#100
NorthDallas40 said:
Oh BS he has been behaving politically for years. And they don’t need clearances I their roles. This is karma and will be on Clapper Yates and Hayden too I believe Comey and McCabe are at least deactivated.
Click to expand...

I just heard you agree that this was politically motivated. I'm glad we could agree.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top