ru4real-really?
NO AH ZONE
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 2,091
- Likes
- 1,839
AD’s haven’t been disastrous
Hart hired Barnes
Currie hired Tony
Fulmer renewed Barnes somehow even though he was halfway out the door with his Uhaul loaded for UCLA
White-need I say more?
Although each of these also had some terrible decisions, all 4 got us to where we are now.
It takes a village (sometimes of idiots and mistakes) to raise an elite program.
One of the last radio interviews Pat Summitt ever did, she said she hoped the Lady Vols win multiple championships, but more concerned with the individual student athletes graduating and going out into the world confidently.
So we also can’t lose perspective in that regard. Even with the mess of NIL, I think the leaders of UT are simply continuing and replicating that motto. That and I’ve also noticed an uptick in winning our state in recruiting again.
Exactly....and DC got other opportunities because people understood what he was thrown into....even tho he was getting a paycheck.Coach Fulmer did not make great hires...Clawson was good coach but not right fit Vols.,..
Not going diss CPF won a natty should have won more with talent TN had for yrs.....
Sometimes those things work, but not often enough for either side to try it unless they have to. Troy Aikman started at Oklahoma his second season. After Miami broke his leg, OU went back to the wishbone and Troy was off to UCLA. He had seen the writing on the wall and knew he wouldn't be the guy at OU anymore. Nebraska had some great QBs, too, but they only worked well in the triple option. They would not have worked well in anything Tennessee has ever run. Different styles, but they have to be matched up player to style to win championships.Not to derail the thread but hiring Clawson was simply a bad move by Fulmer. Clawson is a very good coach, just not the right fit for UT.
Imaging Peyton Manning going to Nebraska. Manning was a great QB. Nebraska was great at running the wishbone. That would not have worked well.
Schiano would’ve been a disaster as well. This clowns and fans stood up for what they believed in. I don’t really pin that on Currie, he was hiring who Haslam allowed him to:
The bottom line on Currie is that he was treated very badly and very unfairly. He's a good AD. He hired the coach who brought us our first team national title in, what, 16 years. The whole Schiano thing was mega-idiocy by fans, our feckless chancellor at the time, Fulmer (who coveted the AD job and had the ear of the chancellor, who caved) and some clown state legislators. I'm glad he's doing well at Wake. I'm glad our sports programs are doing well now.
For those who understand how things work, more so in corporate America, with all that went down here, how in the world was he able to rebound as well as he did?
Its absolutely not irrelevant....and you can't run an AD on empty football stadium's. You seem to be confusing what fans thought of him as a coach to his alignment with ped state.Nobody knows what kind of coach he would have been--and this idea that the fans knew is both nonsense and irrelevant. The bottom line is that AD's make decisions, and their decisions are accepted by fans. Fans aren't always thrilled with the AD's choice--that's been true for all schools for ages, but it's the way it's always been done. Fans could have revolted when Dooley was announced--or Jones? ADs don't present fans with a list of candidates and have them vote on their preferred choice. So how the fans think Schiano or anybody will do is completely irrelevant. And we saw how it all evolved with Fulmer--a second disaster after the first.
Naked bootleg out of the wishbone. Peyton could have pulled it off.Not to derail the thread but hiring Clawson was simply a bad move by Fulmer. Clawson is a very good coach, just not the right fit for UT.
Imaging Peyton Manning going to Nebraska. Manning was a great QB. Nebraska was great at running the wishbone. That would not have worked well.
Well, obviously he says he was fired by people less competent than he was. They "just didn't understand" how good he was, and then too, Fulmer was playing dumb cloak-and-dagger games that look stupid now.How does he answer the question “what happened at Tennessee which led to the end of your tenure there”?
I’m being serious, too? I’m surprised anyone picked him up as bad as that situation was!