Well played.
Remember that time you said Holly could coach?
I do. And I stand by my claim that her first 3 years were solid ones. In particular, she did a great job in her first year with Izzy Harrison being lost for the year due to an ACL and still making the elite 8.
Coaching is multi-faceted. Holly was a GREAT recruiter. She was pretty good at coaching an up tempo offensive style. She was not so great at creating a workable half court game. And her ultimate demise was she could not hold a team accountable. As she moved further away from the disciplinary legacy of Pat (and no longer had players who had internalized that system), that is when the wheels came off.
But, place Holly in context. A legend coach had just had to step down due to a tragic illness and as everyone says, following a legend is a tough job. And Summitt's circumstances made it doubly difficult. So yes, I am willing to give Holly credit for keeping the ship afloat and winning multiple SEC titles and making the elite 8 three times (which had become the program norm in the later years of CPS).
When the program started to decline in year 4, my only point about Holly was that she was not going to be fired immediately (which everyone wanted) after having 3 very successful seasons and bringing in a highly coveted recruiting class. I insisted that sacking Holly without giving her shot with her new stars would have generated horrible press and made any replacement candidate have doubts about stepping into the role. [Even after all the transfers, Kellie's team is still mainly built around Holly recruits.]
During Holly's year 5, though, I was 100% on the "we need a coaching change" train.
But, yes you Darth get all the "gloat points" for being anti-Holly from the first second she was announced. She was not the long term solution.
And you will probably be right on Harper. She may win several SEC titles and maybe even a national championship or two but at some point in the future, ten or fifteen years out maybe, it is likely that her record will start decline and there will be a need for new coaching blood.
And at that point, if you are still living, you can again gloat that "see, I told you so, [eventually] Harper was not right for the job!" YIppeee, it only took 15 years to be proven "right".
Personally, I find that a weird thing to live for but who am I to judge? Whatever floats your starfighter.