Wafflestomper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2017
- Messages
- 1,691
- Likes
- 2,028
I suppose you could argue the language is subjective. But that’s not got any bearing on the two physical outcomes. No amount of language or invention of terms is going to alter the physical realityBut someone decided that though. The point I'm making is that definitions are not objective--they're created by people, i.e., subjective.
Pick your distinguishing factor, that’s fine. The problem is when you have someone that meets every acknowledged biological characteristic of a male, but somehow still fancies himself a woman. It’s mental illness"It was all based on the dangly bits up until a few years ago."
Hrm. Things changed when we started to understand chromosomes, chromosomal formation, pituitary response... Holy ****, knowledge made us change the way we view the universe. Knowledge bad! Kill knowledge!
I know some of that, obviously not as much as you. Though that doesn’t make gender mutable, which is more or less my main position in our disputeYes. And using just those two different chromosomes, we have countless combinations. Single X. Fragile X. False XY. XYY. XXY. I could go on, if you'd like.
I suppose you could argue the language is subjective. But that’s not got any bearing on the two physical outcomes. No amount of language or invention of terms is going to alter the physical reality
I guess I’m among the crowd that doesn’t see a distinction between those two things. In my view it’s mental illness, and that was the prevailing view until 5 years ago. I don’t see any legitimate basis for the collective shift in understandingBut the point is that if gender isn't the same as sex then it doesn't matter. Trans people aren't arguing that they don't have the genitals they actually do have. They're arguing that gender is not the same as sex.
I know some of that, obviously not as much as you. Though that doesn’t make gender mutable, which is more or less my main position in our dispute