sammyhagar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 987
- Likes
- 1,209
I have no idea why people slobber all over this guy.
You may think he is overrated as a public intellectual figure, but you have to admit that his "controversial" views as portrayed by main stream media are only controversial because they take everything he says and intentionally misinterpret it in order to create a strawman to attack. If you actually listen to the guy for any period of time, you'll find that there isn't anything blindingly controversial about hardly anything he says. I get that he may be overrated, but I really can't relate to people who hate the guy.
You may think he is overrated as a public intellectual figure, but you have to admit that his "controversial" views as portrayed by main stream media are only controversial because they take everything he says and intentionally misinterpret it in order to create a strawman to attack. If you actually listen to the guy for any period of time, you'll find that there isn't anything blindingly controversial about hardly anything he says. I get that he may be overrated, but I really can't relate to people who hate the guy.
I have no idea what the MSM says about him.
What have you learned from him?
I have no idea what the MSM says about him.
What have you learned from him?
He sounds like a real loser sexist bag.
The way to get a monogamous woman is to be a better man. Maybe these losers should improve themselves or get realistic about the types of women they can get. Lmao
As for what the main stream media has to say about him, just scroll through your Google News feed. There will probably be multiple articles warning of the dangers of listening to such a radical ideologue as Jordan Peterson. NBC aired a special as well where they took a 2.5 hour interview and spliced it all together to make it sound like he was saying the opposite of what he was actually saying. Eventually NBC posted the unedited version and got skewered by viewers for their dishonesty. I think Vice did the exact same thing. He's the least controversial person I can recall who has gotten so much flack for being a controversial boogeyman. I simply can't understand their hatred for the guy. It's not like he's Milo Yiannopoulos or Alex Jones. He's just a guy who likes to think and express his ideas.
You know what the MSM says about your paternal parents? That they both have feminine tendencies and your steps swap roles but, being a middle guy, you’re ok with it or in the very least don’t care. Throw your hands up!IDK what the MSM says about him because I don't care.
I am interested in what people learn from him, because I am having trouble understanding what he offers. People talk about how profound and smart he is, but I can never get a straight answer about what makes him so great.
That's because he uses logic and logic scares the left. It hurts their wittle brains. He 1000x smarter than these libtards put together.You may think he is overrated as a public intellectual figure, but you have to admit that his "controversial" views as portrayed by main stream media are only controversial because they take everything he says and intentionally misinterpret it in order to create a strawman to attack. If you actually listen to the guy for any period of time, you'll find that there isn't anything blindingly controversial about hardly anything he says. I get that he may be overrated, but I really can't relate to people who hate the guy.
I with you man. I've listened to several unedited Peterson debates and discussions. I can understand why so many from the left are squirming. He is a intellectual's intellectual, but that isn't always a good thing. His says some **** where I'm like "what?" but it challenges me and feel compelled to dig deeper.As for what the main stream media has to say about him, just scroll through your Google News feed. There will probably be multiple articles warning of the dangers of listening to such a radical ideologue as Jordan Peterson. NBC aired a special as well where they took a 2.5 hour interview and spliced it all together to make it sound like he was saying the opposite of what he was actually saying. Eventually NBC posted the unedited version and got skewered by viewers for their dishonesty. I think Vice did the exact same thing. He's the least controversial person I can recall who has gotten so much flack for being a controversial boogeyman. I simply can't understand their hatred for the guy. It's not like he's Milo Yiannopoulos or Alex Jones. He's just a guy who likes to think and express his ideas.
You may think he is overrated as a public intellectual figure, but you have to admit that his "controversial" views as portrayed by main stream media are only controversial because they take everything he says and intentionally misinterpret it in order to create a strawman to attack. If you actually listen to the guy for any period of time, you'll find that there isn't anything blindingly controversial about hardly anything he says. I get that he may be overrated, but I really can't relate to people who hate the guy.