creekdipper
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 8,624
- Likes
- 23,216
I can see both sides of that argument. Certainly, comparing relative merits of players has always been a mainstay of any sports forum (especially discussing lineps, starters, etc. or comparing players on different teams). At the same time, we don't need to be denigrating any recruit..not that I think anyone has in this case. When all is said and done, it will be up to the recruits themselves to decide which program fits them best and to the coaching staff to find and attract talented players who will be assets to the program.
Maybe it it weren't a separate thread pitting those two choices against one another, it wouldn't seem so adversarial. It doesn't help when one player has a significant ranking edge, although both players obviously are aware of their scout rankings. Also, we have to remember that there are other talented, uncommitted players out there who might also be under consideration.
Anyway, I agree that we ought to be respectful toward all the athletes when discussing them, even if nothing said here ever reaches their ears or matters to them if it does. Ir's just the right thing to do.
(Climbing down off my soapbox now inside my ultra-conspicuous glass house).
Maybe it it weren't a separate thread pitting those two choices against one another, it wouldn't seem so adversarial. It doesn't help when one player has a significant ranking edge, although both players obviously are aware of their scout rankings. Also, we have to remember that there are other talented, uncommitted players out there who might also be under consideration.
Anyway, I agree that we ought to be respectful toward all the athletes when discussing them, even if nothing said here ever reaches their ears or matters to them if it does. Ir's just the right thing to do.
(Climbing down off my soapbox now inside my ultra-conspicuous glass house).