TennTradition
Defended.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Messages
- 16,919
- Likes
- 822
I'd rather take the steps necessary to prevent global warming and find out I was wrong rather than ignore it and find out I was wrong. I know it has been referred to as "junk science" on here, and maybe it is, but what if it isn't? Just as someone cannot tell you global warming is 100 percent true, someone can't tell me it isn't. We do know that oil won't last forever so I don't think it's a bad thing to see a few more Civics and Corollas and a few less Excursions and Hummers on the road if it is "junk science".
I would be willing to say that the vast majority of those who refer to it as "junk science" understand very little of the details of the science. Junk science is an interesting term anyway - it implies dubious science that exists for political reasons, as opposed to unsound science. I don't classify climate change science as either - but the political influence in this area does bother me. The fundamental problem is that you cannot detach this issue from social policies .... and ultimately this means the politicians will come calling.
This is obviously an issue we need to get right. Some argue that we can't afford inaction - others argue that the cost of inappropriate action could be huge...and I see points on both of these sides.