Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#6,201
#6,201
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...
why was he not allowed to be there but the rioters were??? And the big scary gun didnt travel across state lines..it was already there...your really not the bright
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, StarRaider, Vol737 and 3 others
#6,202
#6,202
whodeycin85 said:
why was he not allowed to be there but the rioters were??? And the big scary gun didnt travel across state lines..it was already there...your really not the bright
Click to expand...
I have come to the conclusion that ole Turbs is a necessity in the PF. Morning coffee is best with a barrel of laughs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, UT_Dutchman, GroverCleveland and 6 others
#6,203
#6,203
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...

I can’t tell if you’re a troll or the less informed person on the internet. The “he drove across state lines” argument that never made sense to begin with has been long since debunked. He worked in that town and his father lived in that town as did his father’s side of the family. That’s why he was there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#6,204
#6,204
PEPPERJAX said:
I have come to the conclusion that ole Turbs is a necessity in the PF. Morning coffee is best with a barrel of laughs.
Click to expand...

Eh ... to each their own I guess. I as well at first thought he was entertaining, now he’s nothing more than a really poor man’s Luther or LG with even less knowledge and common sense and no sense of humor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behr, UT_Dutchman, TNVOLNAVY and 3 others
#6,205
#6,205
Vol8188 said:
I can’t tell if you’re a troll or the less informed person on the internet. The “he drove across state lines” argument that never made sense to begin with has been long since debunked. He worked in that town and his father lived in that town as did his father’s side of the family. That’s why he was there.
Click to expand...
He’s not a troll. He’s a far left lunatic. I realized he wasn’t a troll when he created a thread about the death of the UT swimming coach’s son in the football forum. The people connected to that family are as far left as it gets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary, Vol737 and 2 others
#6,206
#6,206
davethevol said:
He’s not a troll. He’s a far left lunatic. I realized he wasn’t a troll when he created a thread about the death of the UT swimming coach’s son in the football forum. The people connected to that family are as far left as it gets.
Click to expand...
What was the purpose of that thread?
 
#6,209
#6,209
PEPPERJAX said:
What was the purpose of that thread?
Click to expand...
I guess he thought UT football fans would care or know about UT’s swimming coach. They certainly have their followers, but they aren’t as popular with Knox County as they’d like to believe, especially after the multiple lawsuits against Knox County Schools like the mask mandate that basically ruined another year of school for Knox county kids and dropped Knox county to one of the bottom 3 counties in the entire state of TN for test scores at the end of that school year. A lot of people have started paying attention to what’s been going on.
 
#6,210
#6,210
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...
Everyone involved in this situation was there to instigate............. He wasn't the only person there with a gun....... One of the people he shot had a gun.

Seek help!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737, InVOLuntary, StarRaider and 1 other person
#6,213
#6,213

Matthew Giffin Details Socialist Group’s Fight with East Tennessee State University over Upcoming Event Featuring Kyle Rittenhouse​


1706848746630.png


Matthew Giffin, reporter at The Tennessee Star and student at Middle Tennessee State University, joined Wednesday’s edition of The Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy to discuss a socialist group’s response to an event scheduled at East Tennessee State University (ETSU) next week featuring Kyle Rittenhouse.

Rittenhouse is scheduled to appear at ETSU on February 8 for a “Q&A and meet and greet.” The school’s chapter of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) is organizing the event.

Among other demands, the Young Democratic Socialists of America (YDSA) chapter at ETSU has demanded the university make a specific policy prohibiting “hate speech” amid the event. However, an ETSU spokesperson has since confirmed that no such policy exists. The spokesperson clarified that the university maintains a “Campus Free Speech policy” that complies with Tennessee’s Campus Free Speech Protection Act.

tennesseestar.com

Matthew Giffin Details Socialist Group’s Fight with East Tennessee State University over Upcoming Event Featuring Kyle Rittenhouse - Tennessee Star

Matthew Giffin, reporter and MTSU student, joined Wednesday’s edition of The Tennessee Star Report with Michael Patrick Leahy.
tennesseestar.com tennesseestar.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and TNVOLNAVY
#6,218
#6,218
turbovol said:
It's all quite understandable. He doesn't like the protest or the protesters, he's a young meathead with an assault rifle, so he takes his gun and drives across a state line with the explicit intention of getting involved in a street protest. Why?Why was he there? He was there to instigate, that's why---instigate in a volatile situation. He gets into it with some of the protesters--which was bound to happen and absolutely his aim and his dream from the beginning---a couple of them angrily engage with him or come at him--and he uses his gun to kill them.

The self-defense argument was complete bull$hit--he was another idiot with an assault rifle who was expressly there to instigate. He didn't like the protestors--and he was the only person there with a gun. There have been numerous similar cases of these idiots who carry guns around and either try to provoke people whom they don't like or are happy to get involved in such situations because, if a fight breaks out, they've got their gun, can shoot somebody and, like the real pu$$ies they are, claim self-defense. The people this young high-school dropout/criminal killed did not have guns; he did--that's what he was there. He instigated, and he should be in prison. Clowns with guns, trying to impress everybody with how tough they are. They provoke others and get pushed, ad then they shoot somebody. Use your fists, tough guy. The guy is another gun-toting moron and pu$$y.
Click to expand...
I bet you got your ass whipped a lot growing up
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, Vol since 77, NorthDallas40 and 6 others
#6,223
#6,223
lawgator1 said:
No one wanted to get shot, don't be ridiculous. Rittenhouse was hoping for a chance to do some shooting.
Click to expand...

No more ridiculous than you saying the guy who retreated from every altercation in that scenario got what he wanted. Why retreat and expose your back to someone you are just itching to shoot? Your narrative doesn't hold water counselor.

The guy asking for it certainly seemed to, he was literally begging for it and certainly acting like he wanted to be shot.

I think he wanted to feel important and that gun gave him a sense of security and superiority and belongings with the law. If he wanted to plug some people he would have done it from distance like all cowards do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlipKidVol, tbh, UT_Dutchman and 3 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top