Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

[RockyTop85]

Curfew violation is a 250 civil infraction.

Maybe it was something that was misreported but it sounded like they were going to go back and offer evidence of it after the defense motion, but had already closed their case.

 

[RikidyBones]

That’s not really a sound strategy. The judge can dismiss, if he does that.

Keep in mind these are the same prosecutors who apparently just forgot to prove the curfew violation. He was also making himself look like a complete moron when it comes to firearms. I think he’s just not very good.

Why would they trot this guy out on a national interest? Is it a case of the sh** rolling downhill?

 

[StarRaider]

 

[ButchPlz]

 

[0nelilreb]

maybe the prosecutor is angling for a mistrial by violating the judge's earlier ruling - try to get another bite at the apple.

That’s what I told Nurse that I think he’s trying for .

 

[0nelilreb]

Wow , this is some some crazy court drama show on tv . It’s almost embarrassing to watch , almost .

 

[Boston Vol]

Seems that WAPO already knows what the verdict is going to be.

 

[jp1]

This trial is a joke. Charges should be brought against the prosecution for witness tampering.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Not sure why they had him testify. Don't think he needed to testify to win.

Don’t disagree based on how it’s playing out

 

[KnoxRealtorVOL]

Seems that WAPO already knows what the verdict is going to be.

I think you’re misreading this. It says “decisions from the bench”, as in how he’s handling the case. Not “decision from the bench” as in verdict.

 

[VolStrom]

After watching this today, I have two opinions, either the prosecutor is incompetent and is dumb and trying to get the man off, or he is just incompetent.

 

[Orangeburst]

After watching this today, I have two opinions, either the prosecutor is incompetent and is dumb and trying to get the man off, or he is just incompetent.

Probably need some riots to take the focus off Bidens lousy performance

 

[volinbham]

I think you’re misreading this. It says “decisions from the bench”, as in how he’s handling the case. Not “decision from the bench” as in verdict.

he means that the WaPo knows it will be an acquittal when they think it should be guilty so they are making excuses for why they are still right - it's the judge's fault

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

View attachment 410757

If he loses this case he (prosecutor) probably goes into hiding for years to come.
The angry hate radical "woke" mob will harass him until he moves to another country.

 

[volinbham]

That’s not really a sound strategy. The judge can dismiss, if he does that.

Keep in mind these are the same prosecutors who apparently just forgot to prove the curfew violation. He was also making himself look like a complete moron when it comes to firearms. I think he’s just not very good.

I was just throwing it out to explain what seems to be a mistake by the prosecutor

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

So to all of those who thought Rittenhouse is nothing but a no good piece of crap murderer, what’s your thoughts now?

 

[StarRaider]

 

[RikidyBones]

This prosecutor is an idiot. He's implying that Kyle should have gone out there without a weapon and it's unreasonable to anticipate having to defend yourself in a violet event (riot). Fuggin moron.

 

[NEO]

Wow , this is some some crazy court drama show on tv . It’s almost embarrassing to watch , almost .

I don’t think I have ever seen anything like this before. It’s like watching a train wreck.

 

[RockyTop85]

I was just throwing it out to explain what seems to be a mistake by the prosecutor

I’m just telling you why it would be a bad idea to do that intentionally. Especially with a judge who seems like he’s giving wide latitude to the constitution in this case.

The first question was over the line. If he had started out with the rephrased version, some judges might have let him make the point that he’s had the opportunity to tailor his testimony but he planted the seed with the first question.

Edit: Haha. I turned it off to get some work done but apparently he brought up the comment about using the AR on looters without getting permission first? Whooo boy. Maybe they are dumb enough to try this strategy.

 

[vols4sure]

So to all of those who thought Rittenhouse is nothing but a no good piece of crap murderer, what’s your thoughts now?

I am at same place I always was - "no good piece of crap but not a murderer." What has surprised me is how strong the self-defense evidence has been.

 

[ButchPlz]

I am at same place I always was - "no good piece of crap but not a murderer." What has surprised me is how strong the self-defense evidence has been.

How is it surprising? It was pretty apparent from everything that came out (videos, social media posts, etc.) that each of those that got shot were after the kid.

 

[vols4sure]

How is it surprising? It was pretty apparent from everything that came out (videos, social media posts, etc.) that each of those that got shot were after the kid.

They have had some additional footage that came out. At least it was new to me.

 

[volinbham]

I am at same place I always was - "no good piece of crap but not a murderer." What has surprised me is how strong the self-defense evidence has been.

Yep. He was an idiot being attacked by other idiots and the other idiots paid for it. Doesn't make him guilty of murder but he's still an idiot for involving himself.

Reminds me of Leach's comments about a post game brawl

"The root of it is dumb no matter what the root of it was. The continuation of it was dumb. I would have it solidly in the category of dumb. Where the dumb started I am not entirely sure."

 

[vols4sure]

Yep. He was an idiot being attacked by other idiots and the other idiots paid for it. Doesn't make him guilty of murder but he's still an idiot for involving himself.

Reminds me of Leach's comments about a post game brawl

"The root of it is dumb no matter what the root of it was. The continuation of it was dumb. I would have it solidly in the category of dumb. Where the dumb started I am not entirely sure."

I'll say the same thing I always say when a cop uses unnecessary force against someone resisting arrest - Put yourself in a bad situation and the odds increase that something bad happens to you. Does not make it right but it is the way of the world.