Well, let's see, by changing the name of the assistant coach and changing a few of the accomplishments, your paragraph would have read like this in 2011:
"Holly Warlick was a three time All-American (1977-1980) and 1980 Olympian. Warlick began her coaching career at Virginia Tech and then Nebraska as associate head coach (1983-85). Then she returned home to UT in 1985 as an assistant coach and later as associate head coach responsible for the defense (not the horrible Pat Summitt offense) and recruiting responsibilities. Why not give her the chance as LV coach? She certainly has the experience and track record to get the LV's back on track again."
How has that worked out?
The point is not to derogate your post but to point out what a crapshoot it is hiring somebody. Warlick arguably had a deeper, better resume than Elzy has. Elzy may make a great head coach someday (I hope she does). But nothing's for certain. And I for one am interested in a coach outside the Pat Summitt tree, for what I think are obvious reasons.