And just how far do you think a turn-over prone team, playing so far at an SOS >90 schedule, will make it in the SEC and later in the NCAA's? Fans who think constructive analysis of real facts equates to Holly/team bashing or NEGATIVITY are the same fans who at the end of the season (will it be SW 16 this year?) say wait until next year. 28 turnovers is unacceptable. The inability to break a press is a big problem especially at the caliber of opponets so far.
BTW next year Nared and Mercedes are gone.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Edit:
My post was made after reading just the beginning of this thread. Not siding with the mindset of the Wikileaks of the world. Am siding with the fact that a lot of turnovers on such a weak schedule is not a good thing
Thank you for the clarity. I agree turnovers need to be cut down and with us having 9 in the first half I was like here we go again. I was pleased to see that when we were more aggressive and playing freely we cut the turnovers down in the second half even with Vandy playing harder to stay in the game. Someone listened during half time and from the press conference it sounded like the coaches got the players attentions.