Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

[RikidyBones]

I’m no mathematical genius, but I think it’s:
Covfefe

I think you are. If a circle had a circumference of 43.96 meters. What is the radius of that circle?

I know you got this.

Since we are doing this... @OHvol40 ...

Find the equation y = a x 2 + x of the parabola that is tangent to the line with equation y = 3 x + 1.

 

[LouderVol]

I think it's time to stop conceding the point that the lock down is saving lives from the virus alone, aside from other secondary reasons.

No one from the party of science has explained to me how the lock down is saving any lives in the final analysis. It's just playing pretend, virtue signaling, and hoping they can kneel down and run the clock out on the economy before November.

November 4th will come around and if Biden wins, it will be time to open everything back up because we beat Donald Tr... I mean the virus. Then everyone will realize we have been had.

It's like a meme I have seen.

You know why Covid 19 wont show up next year? Because 2021 isnt an election year.

 

[VolStrom]

Since we are doing this... @OHvol40 ...

Find the equation y = a x 2 + x of the parabola that is tangent to the line with equation y = 3 x + 1.

y = mx + b
what does this equation solve? This should be really really easy for anyone that had more than high school math.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

Since we are doing this... @OHvol40 ...

Find the equation y = a x 2 + x of the parabola that is tangent to the line with equation y = 3 x + 1.

 

[DC_Vol]

Since we are doing this... @OHvol40 ...

Find the equation y = a x 2 + x of the parabola that is tangent to the line with equation y = 3 x + 1.

x^2 + x ?

Edit: x - x^2

I did my gozentas wrong on my head

 

[hjeagle1vol]

x^2 + x ?

I thought I was kewl cause I can center a quarter from 500 yards, but yawl smart folk must get all the women.

 

[TennTradition]

What's the cubic root of 343?

Did someone say cubic?

 

[DC_Vol]

I thought I was kewl cause I can center a quarter from 500 yards, but yawl smart folk must get all the women.

I think that’s pretty cool

 

[BennesseeVols]

Since we are doing this... @OHvol40 ...

Find the equation y = a x 2 + x of the parabola that is tangent to the line with equation y = 3 x + 1.

nevermind haha

 

[TennTradition]

My neighbor just put this up in his front yard. Causing quite the stir
View attachment 277342

Beautiful lawn.

 

[volinbham]

Had a townhall at the university today. The healthcare side including the health system has lost $230 million in revenue from the shutdown. That's one (albeit large) health system.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

I think that’s pretty cool

The women don't like it cause I make them hold the quarter.

 

[DC_Vol]

The women don't like it cause I make them hold the quarter.

What a lady’s man

 

[TennTradition]

Since we are doing this... @OHvol40 ...

Find the equation y = a x 2 + x of the parabola that is tangent to the line with equation y = 3 x + 1.

y = -x^2 + x

amiright?

 

[hjeagle1vol]

What a lady’s man

They're good cause they know a quarter ain't all that's getting centered

 

[allvol123]

 

[StarRaider]

y = -x^2 + x

amiright?

I wuz under the impression there would be no math

 

[McDad]

I wuz under the impression there would be no math

I like my math with...you know...actual NUMBERS. Once you get more than one or two letters my eyes go doughnuts.

 

[volfanhill]

Seemed like the best place for this

 

[NurseGoodVol]

I put my time in as a floor nurse too sweetheart, then I got smart.

In must be missing the smart part, not apparent.

 

[NCFisher]

Thanks for validating Amash’s comments about Bill Barr. Let’s take it a step further:

How come Bill Barr can’t let any independent judges handle these obviously impermissible cases?

I mean, if it’s so obvious that these poor innocent trump toadies were being railroaded why has not one single independent fact finder made that determination?

Every. Single. Time. That the courts or a jury has been handed evidence from this investigation the result has been a conviction. The only vindicating events for the people who believe in this have been the result of DOJ brass (Bill Barr) involvement.

He can’t leave it in the hands of Judges because they’re impartial and the things he’s saying are legal fiction. The public record speaks for itself and the public record shows that when Trump Co’s minions go in front of judge or jury, they lose.

The rest of the post seems devoid of any relation to what I’ve said. Pretty weak, IMO, but maybe I wasn’t clear. I’ll just clarify and restate what I said.

The omissions/errors/fabrications in the Carter Page FISA application, regardless of materiality (which hasn’t been established), are evidence that the FBI cannot be afforded the discretion they have been. They do not absolve Trump of anything. They are not evidence of Trump et al’s innocence, they’re simply evidence of wrongdoing by someone else. The case have no heightened significance. Its being used as a scapegoat to deflect attention from evidence of Trump’s corruption.

The omissions/errors/fabrications in 29/29 other applications are overwhelming evidence that FBI and law enforcement discretion should be limited or subject to more thorough oversight. It also proves that the Page App wasn’t a coup.

That is the logical line between the best I can recall of Amash’s explanation of his thoughts on the Special Counsel investigation and the tweet that I spent 30 seconds finding this afternoon.

The other argument, which seems to have you horribly confused, is not that Trump deserved it, but that Trump’s position is less desirable than Amash’s, and yet is not disqualifying to you. Therefore your shrieking about Amash and your hysterical, performative nonsense about how much you care about “our rights,” just doesn’t move the needle. It doesn’t carry any weight because as I’ve said in several posts now: the issues is clearly all partisan and no principle, for you.

The only convictions are from process or financial crimes. Every. Single. One.

I don't recall special counsel being appointed because process and tax criminals had interfered in the U.S. election. Again, both investigations had no legitimate or legal predication; the results tell us that. The finding of "No conspiracy" exonerates Trump, but we really didn't need to wait for Mueller's probe to inform us of that.

Flynn is still in the hands of a judge, but he's no longer the subject of a Stalinesque prosecution.

Thank goodness Barr ordered a review of the case by U.S Atty Jeff Jensen, in Jan 2020, eh? In just a few months he was able to help prosecutor Van Grack find the exculpatory evidence that had eluded him for over two years, and recommend the charges against Flynn be dropped; what a busy, busy guy Van Grack must have been! Otherwise, an innocent man would lose not only his home and life savings, but his liberty as well.

Barr is on solid ground. I challenge you to specify the "legal fictions" he's engaged in.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the best thing you've posted:

"The omissions/errors/fabrications in 29/29 other applications are overwhelming evidence that FBI and law enforcement discretion should be limited or subject to more thorough oversight. It also proves that the Page App wasn’t a coup."​

You can't be serious. How many of the 29 involved a presidential nominee and president elect, or two massive investigations over 3 years involving our CIA, FBI, DOJ, Five Eyes and other foreign agencies assisting them, 37-yr generals, another military officer who also served as a CIA and FBI asset, and spectacularly deepened the nation's divisions? And that's not even scratching the surface of how much they're unalike.

That you'd propose to create an analogy about events of such magnitude and 29 cases you know nothing about is preposterous. Do you think any of them - ALL of them - compare remotely in consequence, or were given the same treatment as the great election conspiracy scandal by CIA, FBI, and DOJ?

Of course not, and not even a slip and fall lawyer would embarrass himself with such logic.

 

[StarRaider]

The only convictions are from process or financial crimes. Every. Single. One.

I don't recall special counsel being appointed because process and tax criminals had interfered in the U.S. election. Again, both investigations had no legitimate or legal predication; the results tell us that. The finding of "No conspiracy" exonerates Trump, but we really didn't need to wait for Mueller's probe to inform us of that.

Flynn is still in the hands of a judge, but he's no longer the subject of a Stalinesque prosecution.

Thank goodness Barr ordered a review of the case by U.S Atty Jeff Jensen, in Jan 2020, eh? In just a few months he was able to help prosecutor Van Grack find the exculpatory evidence that had eluded him for over two years, and recommend the charges against Flynn be dropped; what a busy, busy guy Van Grack must have been! Otherwise, an innocent man would lose not only his home and life savings, but his liberty as well.

Barr is on solid ground. I challenge you to specify the "legal fictions" he's engaged in.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the best thing you've posted:

"The omissions/errors/fabrications in 29/29 other applications are overwhelming evidence that FBI and law enforcement discretion should be limited or subject to more thorough oversight. It also proves that the Page App wasn’t a coup."​

You can't be serious. How many of the 29 involved a presidential nominee and president elect, or two massive investigations over 3 years involving our CIA, FBI, DOJ, Five Eyes and other foreign agencies assisting them, 37-yr generals, another military officer who also served as a CIA and FBI asset, and spectacularly deepened the nation's divisions? And that's not even scratching the surface of how

That you'd propose to create an analogy about events of such magnitude and 29 cases you know nothing about is preposterous. Do you think any of them - ALL of them - compare remotely in consequence, or were given the same treatment as the great election conspiracy scandal by CIA, FBI, and DOJ?

Of course not, and not even a slip and fall lawyer would embarrass himself with such logic.

 

[1972 Grad]

In must be missing the smart part, not apparent.

If his bedside manner is anything like his personality on here, I would think he would do better herding sheep.

 

[VolnJC]

Remember when the NYC health commissioner and mayor mocked Trump about the China travel ban? They told people to go to restaurants, take the subway, and to check out the parade.....turns out that is where it started spreading
Travel From New York City Seeded Wave of U.S. Outbreaks

 

[RockyTop85]

-
This is the best thing you've posted:

"The omissions/errors/fabrications in 29/29 other applications are overwhelming evidence that FBI and law enforcement discretion should be limited or subject to more thorough oversight. It also proves that the Page App wasn’t a coup."​

You can't be serious. How many of the 29 involved a presidential nominee and president elect, or two massive investigations over 3 years involving our CIA, FBI, DOJ, Five Eyes and other foreign agencies assisting them, 37-yr generals, another military officer who also served as a CIA and FBI asset, and spectacularly deepened the nation's divisions? And that's not even scratching the surface of how much they're unalike.

That you'd propose to create an analogy about events of such magnitude and 29 cases you know nothing about is preposterous. Do you think any of them - ALL of them - compare remotely in consequence, or were given the same treatment as the great election conspiracy scandal by CIA, FBI, and DOJ?
.

I can’t believe this is where you went after the performative self-righteousness about how much you care about rights and liberty.

You care about “Our rights” you just care more about the president being free from accountability?

That seems... inconsistent. Does the ******** even pass through your brain on its way to the keys or is just reflexive?

Presumably none of them were related to a political campaign, unless you think Trump is the first of 29 presidential candidates to be surveilled and be a whiny bitch about it. As plausible as that is presumably they’re just run of the mill fisa apps.

And yet they had more errors/omissions/fabrications on average than the one that you think is more significant. Thank you for emphasizing my point for me.