LSU Freek's latest.

#26
#26
Chances are given LSU's QB and RB woes that night that they probably wouldn't have been able to do anything with the turnover. With that being said, the issue is if it was an interception - not the chances of LSU winning. It was more than obvious that it was indeed an interception.
 
#32
#32
JoshTheVol12 said:
No_INT.gif


Funny, true, both?
Click to expand...

:eek:lol: awesome
 
#33
#33
#37
#37
LSUfreek farks hardly qualify as indisputable video evidence.
 
Last edited:
#39
#39
JoshTheVol12 said:
Summary of LSU-Bama officiating errors...WITH PHOTOS! - Tiger Rant - LSU Sports Forum - TigerDroppings.com
Click to expand...
I'm hesitant to make a call one way or the other based on a couple of still photos -- regarding at what point Peterson had fully secured controlled possession of the ball and whether either foot was touching the boundary line at the point that he had accomplished that. Expert officials who saw the play and reviewed video replays are better able and better qualified than me to do that.

There are some still photos of Julio's big play where LSU fans are whining that there was a block in the back on an LSU defender. On video it looks more like the defender was faked out of his cleats to the point that he would not have made the play and that the blocker hand checked rather than push him. Good no call, IMO.

The series of photos claiming LSUs QB was speared shows that he was indeed not speared with the crown (top) of the helmet but that the defender hit him with the forehead part of his helmet which is legal. That same series of photos shows that an LSU lineman was blantantly holding Bama player #25 (Rolando McClain), but the LSU fans failed to mention that.

A lot of observers see what they want to see. Still photos can be very misleading. Video is much better for assessing what actually occurred on a given play.

Keep trying consiracy theorists. :crazy:
 
Last edited:
#40
#40
It didn't decide the game and you guys still won, but give it up. That no-INT call was wrong.

I don't believe in the conspiracy either, just that Florida and Bama have gotten a rash of crucial calls their way this season.
 
#43
#43
Tidal Surge said:
The edge of Peterson's foot might have been touching the edge of the boundary line, which may have been the reason the official on the field ruled it incomplete. If so, then by rule the video evidence to the contrary must be indisputable in order to overturn the ruling on the field. Due to the camera angle(s) the video evidence is inconclusive.

From the NCAA rules:

ARTICLE 3. a. A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line."

Julio Jones was out of bounds. Perhaps the ruling was that he touched the ball simultaneously with Peterson's initial contact with the ball, making the ball out of bounds (dead) at that instant. I'm not saying that is the case, but it might be.

Just because Gary Danielson (CBS commentator) said he thought the officials got it wrong does not mean they definitely got it wrong. For example, Gary also said on the air right after Cody blocked UT's game winning FG try vs UA, that Cody should have been flagged for removing his helmet and that UT should have gotten a rekick. Gary learned later that he (like Lane Kiffin) did not know the rules pertinent to the situation. Gary Danieson at least showed enough class to come on the air and make an apologetic statement that he did not know the rules and was wrong in stating that UT was due a rekick opportunity.

It'll be interesting to see if the SEC issues any kind of statement about this controversial call from the UA vs LSU game as to whether the officials definitely got this right due to the rule I cited above or that it's a case of the foot having been ruled on the line and that the video evidence could not support overturning the call.
Click to expand...

Garbage. You are inconclusive.
 
#44
#44
I think that it was a terrible call and that it was an interception. I am not going to lie, I was happier than a bald headed bumble bee in a 100 acre clover patch, though when they said Bama's ball.

That being said, we had held their offense to 6 yards that whole quarter. I kinda wish they would have made the right call now, but it's just one of those things we will never know.
 
#45
#45
Tidal Surge said:
Keep trying consiracy theorists. :crazy:
Click to expand...

The reason I copied the link was just the first couple of pictures to show how inbounds he was, as for the rest well those kinda calls get missed so much it's not funny, and I also believe that the gif that LSUfreek did was hilarious, never said anywhere I believed it was a conspiracy..
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top