VOLatile
BRB Pooping
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Messages
- 14,622
- Likes
- 805
For some reason I trust the hackers more than the security personnel. Most of the time, the people these guys go after seem pretty slimy. I have a slight doubt about the actual information released. But my give a **** meter is not high enough for me to go hunting down more information.
Usually I agree with what these people are doing, this time, if the information is true, it's borderline. However, they've clearly gotten under the skin of the gov't and security firms, and I don't know if I can take an article at face value.
For some reason I trust the hackers more than the security personnel. Most of the time, the people these guys go after seem pretty slimy. I have a slight doubt about the actual information released. But my give a **** meter is not high enough for me to go hunting down more information.
Usually I agree with what these people are doing, this time, if the information is true, it's borderline. However, they've clearly gotten under the skin of the gov't and security firms, and I don't know if I can take an article at face value.
So the state of Arizona trying to prevent illegal immigration makes it okay for personal information of law enforcement personnel to be released to the pubic? Sounds like you only care about people who agree with you.Like I said with Wikileaks... If they weren't doing **** like this then there'd be nothing to for LulzSec to uncover and release.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
For some reason I trust the hackers more than the security personnel. Most of the time, the people these guys go after seem pretty slimy. I have a slight doubt about the actual information released. But my give a **** meter is not high enough for me to go hunting down more information.
Usually I agree with what these people are doing, this time, if the information is true, it's borderline. However, they've clearly gotten under the skin of the gov't and security firms, and I don't know if I can take an article at face value.
How is it doable? Hackers at home on their own time have been and always will be steps ahead of the best the corporate sector and the government have to offer. It's literally like having thousands of John Dillingers on the internet.
So all the account info on Sony Users they hacked are slimy people?
My favorite is most people fail to realize that you defend them now until its your info they are throwing out to the general public where the guys you hate can easily steal your identity, sometimes they are the same people.
Based off what I read, Sony wasn't protecting my PII at all. And I don't know what groups are what. Did "lulz" do both, and I'm guessing "lulz" is different from "Anonymous"?
If they are caught, that's fine, punish them according to their crime. They aren't terrorists though. This isn't Die Hard.
And I do have a PS3. I'm more upset that Sony had their thumbs up their butts in regards to protecting my CC information.
A document labeled "iphone apps- used against officers.doc" front-line officers encourages officers making an arrest to search for iPhones or other smartphones and look specifically to see what apps are running on them.
Specifically the document warns that an app called Cop Recorder can be activated while the phone is in a suspect's pocket to record what happens during an arrest, then upload the audio to a network server beyond the officer's reach.
Based off what I read, Sony wasn't protecting my PII at all. And I don't know what groups are what. Did "lulz" do both, and I'm guessing "lulz" is different from "Anonymous"?
If they are caught, that's fine, punish them according to their crime. They aren't terrorists though. This isn't Die Hard.
And I do have a PS3. I'm more upset that Sony had their thumbs up their butts in regards to protecting my CC information.