To be clear, I’m not ripping McClung (not that I assume you were referring to me), and I’ve even said I’d trade him for Bailey, right now.
I just can’t call it a miss by Barnes because McClung and Bailey are just too similar. So, unless you are suggesting Barnes should have taken McClung directly out of high school (only P6 offers were GU and Seton Hall), or you’re suggesting he should have run off Bailey before he ever played a game for Tennessee after transferring and sitting out a year to take McClung, then it isn’t fair for you to consider it a miss, either, is it?
Just because we believe McClung can play doesn’t mean Tennessee needed to take him or that we need an entire team of high volume shooting guards. With the benefit of hindsight, I think a lot of people would hold off on Bailey and be more welcoming of the idea of taking McClung, but we didn’t have the luxury of hindsight at the time. And sure, Barnes has had some misses, but very few have been at the guard position. Again, we can’t continue to take a bunch of guards just because they can play, and ignore our need in the post.