esarmstrong
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,481
- Likes
- 4,889
sorry but that's just dumb. Someone actually had to click the link to see the word that Drudge had actually removed.
love libs when they try and attack the "media". Good times
I guess I am a little bit confused here. The original link from the original poster to this thread had the word "Controversial" in the link.
This may suprise you, but I don't take the Drudge report; so when you refer to words being "removed" I don't believe I know what that refers to. I am refering to a word that appears in the title as being problematic.
BTW, in a feeble attempt to get back on to the matters that are most important, get well Peyton and GBO. Dont' want anyone to get the idea that this is not a sports site anymore
I guess I am a little bit confused here. The original link from the original poster to this thread had the word "Controversial" in the link.
This may suprise you, but I don't take the Drudge report; so when you refer to words being "removed" I don't believe I know what that refers to. I am refering to a word that appears in the title as being problematic.
The fact that Drudge is reporting it from this angle is no suprise. Yellow Journalism at its worst.
BTW, in a feeble attempt to get back on to the matters that are most important, get well Peyton and GBO. Dont' want anyone to get the idea that this is not a sports site anymore
it's a website. You type in the address and can get there pretty quick. No need to subscribe just type and go. You are just all over the place now. He links stories, he doesn't make up the news. If you're mad about the word "controversial" you should get on the UK press since the word wasn't used by Drudge.
enjoy your bias
I will, I certainly don't enjoy your bias.
Drudge chose repeat the story with the misleading title. He owns it too.
what bias? He linked a story and first you claim it shows Drudge's bias because he sued the title and now you claim he's simply biased for linking it. Which is it? How does linking a story show bias? He didn't make you read it and didn't tell you much at all besides repeating the title (while even removing the word "controversial" so libs wouldn't get their panties in a wad)