Manning article makes Drudge Report

#28
#28
That he reported the story in the first place with that word in the title is the reflection on his agenda, IMO.

sorry but that's just dumb. Someone actually had to click the link to see the word that Drudge had actually removed.

love libs when they try and attack the "media". Good times
 
#30
#30
sorry but that's just dumb. Someone actually had to click the link to see the word that Drudge had actually removed.

love libs when they try and attack the "media". Good times

I guess I am a little bit confused here. The original link from the original poster to this thread had the word "Controversial" in the link.

This may suprise you, but I don't take the Drudge report; so when you refer to words being "removed" I don't believe I know what that refers to. I am refering to a word that appears in the title as being problematic.

BTW, in a feeble attempt to get back on to the matters that are most important, get well Peyton and GBO. Dont' want anyone to get the idea that this is not a sports site anymore
 
#31
#31
I guess I am a little bit confused here. The original link from the original poster to this thread had the word "Controversial" in the link.

This may suprise you, but I don't take the Drudge report; so when you refer to words being "removed" I don't believe I know what that refers to. I am refering to a word that appears in the title as being problematic.

BTW, in a feeble attempt to get back on to the matters that are most important, get well Peyton and GBO. Dont' want anyone to get the idea that this is not a sports site anymore

nice back peddle
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#33
#33
I guess I am a little bit confused here. The original link from the original poster to this thread had the word "Controversial" in the link.

This may suprise you, but I don't take the Drudge report; so when you refer to words being "removed" I don't believe I know what that refers to. I am refering to a word that appears in the title as being problematic.

then why automatically take a shot at Drudge instead of the article? Drudgereport.com is a pretty simple website to check before making a statement like
The fact that Drudge is reporting it from this angle is no suprise. Yellow Journalism at its worst.

BTW, in a feeble attempt to get back on to the matters that are most important, get well Peyton and GBO. Dont' want anyone to get the idea that this is not a sports site anymore

this is the Politics forum. We have quite a few different ones on VN
 
#34
#34
The fact that I don't subscribe to a forum doesn't mean I am not familiar with his work and what he has published nor does it mean I have not read him before.

Did not know a story about Manning's surgery and a stem cell procedure would appear in a political forum. Maybe because a person with a known agenda was repeating the story with his misleading word in the title.
 
#35
#35
it's a website. You type in the address and can get there pretty quick. No need to subscribe just type and go. You are just all over the place now. He links stories, he doesn't make up the news. If you're mad about the word "controversial" you should get on the UK press since the word wasn't used by Drudge.

enjoy your bias
 
#36
#36
it's a website. You type in the address and can get there pretty quick. No need to subscribe just type and go. You are just all over the place now. He links stories, he doesn't make up the news. If you're mad about the word "controversial" you should get on the UK press since the word wasn't used by Drudge.

enjoy your bias

I will, I certainly don't enjoy your bias.

Drudge chose to repeat the story with the misleading title. He owns it too.
 
Last edited:
#37
#37
I will, I certainly don't enjoy your bias.

Drudge chose repeat the story with the misleading title. He owns it too.

what bias? He linked a story and first you claim it shows Drudge's bias because he sued the title and now you claim he's simply biased for linking it. Which is it? How does linking a story show bias? He didn't make you read it and didn't tell you much at all besides repeating the title (while even removing the word "controversial" so libs wouldn't get their panties in a wad)
 
#38
#38
BTW, I did not realise I was in the political forum until you pointed it out, Mr. Moderator. I went to this link from the page where the newest and most viewed threads appear.

Learn something new everyday.
 
#39
#39
what bias? He linked a story and first you claim it shows Drudge's bias because he sued the title and now you claim he's simply biased for linking it. Which is it? How does linking a story show bias? He didn't make you read it and didn't tell you much at all besides repeating the title (while even removing the word "controversial" so libs wouldn't get their panties in a wad)

I am bowing out now. I have a day job to get to. You get the last word.

It has been interesting...
 
#45
#45
Well, let me commend you on your communication skills for someone so young. You are a shining example for all 11 year olds to emulate.
:hi:

got out of college @ 8....... im the black sheep in the family for taking so long to get out of school........
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#47
#47
That was a great age. I loved Kindergarten.


um, wait, did I say that?

er

I thought it was ramen numberals or something. Yeah, thats it. Really. I was II in kindergarten, not 11...

I give up. Does that make me a liberal?

u know it!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 

VN Store



Back
Top