Surely you think it says something about recruiting.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It's a bit premature to say this. He's been here four years, which means he could've only had one class that's been at UT for all four years. Also, if Jerry and Buzz couldn't develop those recruits and get their max potential out them, then what does it matter? And besides, Bruce will have his share of players in the NBA after next year.
How long were Buzz and Green here?
Surely you would agree that Pearl's best players were Peterson recruits?
Seems to me that Pearl's recruits have all underperformed their billing. That's a very bad sign.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Weezy. BW.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
He's the most inconsistent player I've ever seen at UT, but he's probably the closest thing to achieving what was expected. The rest haven't been anywhere close.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
How long were Buzz and Green here?
Surely you would agree that Pearl's best players were Peterson recruits?
Seems to me that Pearl's recruits have all underperformed their billing. That's a very bad sign.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
What? I'm not faulting anyone for inheriting players. I'm faulting Pearl for recruiting underachievers and failing to outrecruits his two short lived predecessors. That's relevant, period.Are you going to fault Urban Meyer for winning with Zook's players? That's part of the transition between coaches, some of your best players are going to be recruits from the previous coach.
And to respond to your comment about the length of tenure of the previous coaches...answer me this: How many of Buzz's players were in the NBA in 2006? We're talking about his recruits being in the NBA four years after he's gone.
And once again, if you can't develop your players, good recruiting classes will not matter, which is why drawing comparisons between Bruce and the previous two coaches is irrelevant.
What? I'm not faulting anyone for inheriting players. I'm faulting Pearl for recruiting underachievers and failing to outrecruits his two short lived predecessors. That's relevant, period.
In other words, Buzz and Green both sucked but have equaled Pearl.
Player development in this current situation is an absolute joke. It's probably our greatest weakness and THE reason our execution sucks.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I don't get it. You say that both Buzz and Green have equaled Pearl in recruiting, yet you say player development is garbage. Then what accounts for Pearl being more successful than those coaches?