You said that everyone is greedy, and greed is essentially why people donate to charity.
OK :crazy:
Exactly. When I do something charitable I feel good. How do I know I didn't do it out of my greedy need to feel good?
I never said it was impossible that some people may give to charity driven out of a greed for something.
BUT, if you think it's possible that some people give to charity out of greed, then you can just as easily say the King relatives were also acting out of greed by taking $800k for the rights on this monument. Something you originally said was a stupid claim.
I can't take anyone seriously who thinks it's a possibility that my anonymous donations to charity are done out of greed. That is absurd.
It kind of sounded like you were saying it is impossible. You couldn't even take me seriously because I was saying it was possible:
The point about MLK's family is that it's not useful to describe them as greedy because everyone is greedy. Have you ever turned down a raise? People in the third world probably think it's very greedy for an American to accept a job that pays $30K.
Let's just cut to the heart of the matter and ask people in the 3rd world if they think the Kings are being greedy.
We disagree on the premise that greed = self-interest. I think it's a stonewall to your libertarian leanings, which is completely unnecessary.
I do think people do what's in their best interest (or at least what they think is their best interest). It doesn't make them greedy. They are two different things
I can't take anyone seriously who thinks it's a possibility that my anonymous donations to charity are done out of greed. That is absurd.