Marxist Black Lives Matter

Educate yourself and stop lying. From the article:

We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/
The important word you are ignoring is “requirement”
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
I've never understood the logic of the right pointing to black on black crime so much when confronted with police action that can be criticized.

Why does one excuse the other? Makes no sense.

Because the left wants it to be about race....IT ISN'T. They only flip their s*** when some worthless pos career criminal (black) thug meets their unfortunate demise due to their own actions.
 
I've never understood the logic of the right pointing to black on black crime so much when confronted with police action that can be criticized.

Why does one excuse the other? Makes no sense.
1) Because black on black murder is the number 1 cause of death of black teens in the USA, and makes police brutality look like the insignificant pebble of a problem that it is by comparison.

2) The short sighted police "reform" is causing the murder rate to sky rocket from lack of proactive policing, which has been studied to be a predictable consequence of police protests.

But yeah. Makes no sense...
 
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

I don't know why you guys insist on going full head in the sand with that group, it's hilarious.

Using their own convoluted language to convince yourselves they aren't about what explicitly claim to be about.
I don’t know why you are incapable of reading comprehension. They are not saying they want to blow up the nuclear family. Just the belief that it’s the only way to successfully raise kids. You don’t need an English degree here.
 
1) Because black on black murder is the number 1 cause of death of black teens in the USA, and makes police brutality look like the insignificant pebble of a problem that it is by comparison.

2) The short sighted police "reform" is causing the murder rate to sky rocket from lack of proactive policing, which has been studied to be a predictable consequence of police protests.

But yeah. Makes no sense...


So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.
 
So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.

The powers that be are literally turning a blind eye to one because it won’t be politically advantageous , while calling for the police to be defunded / disbanded , which in turn will cause the first to go up even more . We are throwing the baby out with the bath water just because theres a spot of dirt on the baby we arent scrubbing .. makes no logical sense whatsoever .
 
Last edited:
So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.

What is your solution? Come with specifics. Actually, come with a specific problem set and a specific treatment plan. I want to know what the problems are (as defined by you), and what the solutions should be (again, as defined by you).

You have NOTHING. But, for my own entertainment I hope you answer. Think hard. Try harder. Recruit help from your buddies. Hopefully, you'll all gang up on me so that I can squash this whole thing once and for all. Take your time, and please reply directly to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
Sidebar discussion:
The police unions seem to be instrumental in keeping the bad apples employed. Either at their current job or making records unavailable at future jobs. Yet, the police union are getting a pass.

Why?

I don’t think they are getting a pass ,( IMO ) the ones setting the policies are getting the pass . If we are talking about local city police then they have a chief ( hold him accountable ) . The local city police chief has a boss ( this is where things get “ tricky “ , his boss is the mayor . The mayor is in charge of of that city including all the things the police do and their polices. County cops are the easiest, the sheriff has the sole responsibility of his force and policies . ( unless they manage to sneak in an “ undersheriff “ Into the mix ) . Most of the problem we have been seeing come from urban city police Departments , like anything follow the power chart up to the top and hold that person responsible... this is where the political problems come into play .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10nacvols
So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.
Except attempting to address the smaller problem without first addressing the bigger problem makes the bigger problem get worse.

The current approach doesn't just not do anything, it makes the problem worse, as I clearly stated in that post you just quoted.

I hate to break it to you, but the world is complicated, and things are correlated in ways that aren't always obvious.

Also, you can gloss over the fact that police brutality is 1/100 the problem of black on black violence all you want to. You sound just like the people you criticise all the time.

What is it the BLM people say about "All Lives Matter"? Like saying your paper cut matters just like a gunshot wound? That is exactly what you are doing.
 
I don’t know why you are incapable of reading comprehension. They are not saying they want to blow up the nuclear family. Just the belief that it’s the only way to successfully raise kids. You don’t need an English degree here.
Why would they explicitly say that, instead of just encouraging black people to have a nuclear family?

Whatever man. They are the only Marxists in history that have no issue with the nuclear family. Sure. Sounds good.

Families: Marxism | Sociology | tutor2u.
 
Why would they explicitly say that, instead of just encouraging black people to have a nuclear family?

Whatever man. They are the only Marxists in history that have no issue with the nuclear family. Sure. Sounds good.

Look at it like this. They have identified that not having a nuclear family is a problem. The propose a solution. They are asking others to realize that it is a tenable solution. You can disagree with it. That’s fine. But they aren’t saying blow up the nuclear family like many here try to claim. And those that do just don’t know how to read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
Look at it like this. They have identified that not having a nuclear family is a problem. The propose a solution. They are asking others to realize that it is a tenable solution. You can disagree with it. That’s fine. But they aren’t saying blow up the nuclear family like many here try to claim. And those that do just don’t know how to read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
Ask yourself this, are they Marxist as they claim? If the answer is yes then I think you are the one having a hard time interpreting what they are saying. Marxist philosophy states that the nuclear family is a vehicle for capitalism and serves to reinforce heirarchy and pass wealth to their children.

Based on the facts above and their stated Marxist beliefs I think it impossible to believe they mean anything else than the goal being to break the nuclear family in keeping with Marxist philosophy.
 
Ask yourself this, are they Marxist as they claim? If the answer is yes then I think you are the one having a hard time interpreting what they are saying. Marxist philosophy states that the nuclear family is a vehicle for capitalism and serves to reinforce heirarchy and pass wealth to their children.

Based on the facts above and their stated Marxist beliefs I think it impossible to believe they mean anything else than the goal being to break the nuclear family in keeping with Marxist philosophy.
You could just use there words but nah too tough for ya?
 
You could just use there words but nah too tough for ya?
You could do the same, but you chose to see their words through a different prism and completely discard Marxist philosophy of which they admittedly subscribe which in practice looks to diminish or abolish the nuclear family........ Which is very similar in wording, I wonder why?
 
Sorry if already posted....lol


Big children, doesn't matter the age.

Seriously, these types, the loud mouth signal virtuing SJW won't let you have your opinion whatever label they want to be called, are children, in every manner, way, shape, and form. Lacking the most basic of parental teaching, or unable to take to it, and obviously void of any type of peers growing up as they never learned how to play with others, or, they were the ones constantly being ostorsized for being whiny little punks.

There is nothing that can be done with these people. Losers and whiners, unhappy little children in a big world where they realize their insignificance. Lame losers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bigun

VN Store



Back
Top