lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,813
- Likes
- 42,950
The important word you are ignoring is “requirement”Educate yourself and stop lying. From the article:
“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”
https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/
I've never understood the logic of the right pointing to black on black crime so much when confronted with police action that can be criticized.
Why does one excuse the other? Makes no sense.
1) Because black on black murder is the number 1 cause of death of black teens in the USA, and makes police brutality look like the insignificant pebble of a problem that it is by comparison.I've never understood the logic of the right pointing to black on black crime so much when confronted with police action that can be criticized.
Why does one excuse the other? Makes no sense.
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/The important word you are ignoring is “requirement”
I don’t know why you are incapable of reading comprehension. They are not saying they want to blow up the nuclear family. Just the belief that it’s the only way to successfully raise kids. You don’t need an English degree here.https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/
I don't know why you guys insist on going full head in the sand with that group, it's hilarious.
Using their own convoluted language to convince yourselves they aren't about what explicitly claim to be about.
I think the Civil War to come will be very bad and it will result in the breakup of the United States and the creation of 4-5 new independent nations.
1) Because black on black murder is the number 1 cause of death of black teens in the USA, and makes police brutality look like the insignificant pebble of a problem that it is by comparison.
2) The short sighted police "reform" is causing the murder rate to sky rocket from lack of proactive policing, which has been studied to be a predictable consequence of police protests.
But yeah. Makes no sense...
So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.
So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.
Sidebar discussion:
The police unions seem to be instrumental in keeping the bad apples employed. Either at their current job or making records unavailable at future jobs. Yet, the police union are getting a pass.
Why?
Except attempting to address the smaller problem without first addressing the bigger problem makes the bigger problem get worse.So deal with both. Don't justify turning a blind eye to one just because the other also exists.
Why would they explicitly say that, instead of just encouraging black people to have a nuclear family?I don’t know why you are incapable of reading comprehension. They are not saying they want to blow up the nuclear family. Just the belief that it’s the only way to successfully raise kids. You don’t need an English degree here.
Why would they explicitly say that, instead of just encouraging black people to have a nuclear family?
Whatever man. They are the only Marxists in history that have no issue with the nuclear family. Sure. Sounds good.
Look at it like this. They have identified that not having a nuclear family is a problem. The propose a solution. They are asking others to realize that it is a tenable solution. You can disagree with it. That’s fine. But they aren’t saying blow up the nuclear family like many here try to claim. And those that do just don’t know how to read.
You could just use there words but nah too tough for ya?Ask yourself this, are they Marxist as they claim? If the answer is yes then I think you are the one having a hard time interpreting what they are saying. Marxist philosophy states that the nuclear family is a vehicle for capitalism and serves to reinforce heirarchy and pass wealth to their children.
Based on the facts above and their stated Marxist beliefs I think it impossible to believe they mean anything else than the goal being to break the nuclear family in keeping with Marxist philosophy.
You could do the same, but you chose to see their words through a different prism and completely discard Marxist philosophy of which they admittedly subscribe which in practice looks to diminish or abolish the nuclear family........ Which is very similar in wording, I wonder why?You could just use there words but nah too tough for ya?
Sorry if already posted....lol