knox73
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,582
- Likes
- 3,106
I love Mashack, but Knecht is our best at getting into the lane.Agree, and feel like he’s a really good fit for this team. We have enough offensive weapons that he just needs to play within himself on that end of the floor. Would like to see him drive and kick a little more though, as he’s maybe our best player at getting into the lane.
I respectfully totally disagree.Possibly but over a longer/larger sample size (6 games in this case) it would seem to have some merit.
It’s a lot more useful as a comparison *within* the same team. It doesn’t totally work because rotations can be quirky but it’s a lot more reliable when the players for whom you’re comparing +/- mostly share the same teammates/circumstances.I respectfully totally disagree.
No matter the sample size, and individual's plus/minus will always be overwhelmingly affected by the performance of the other 4 players the individual has been on the court with. Put me on the court for 50 games with LeBron, Embid, Curry, and Tatum and my plus/minus will be outstanding. Put me on the court for 50 games with 4 fat/slow/short guys and my plus/minus will suck. In either situation, I'm the same player, but my plus/minus is determined NOT by me, but by who I'm on the court with.
I mentioned in another post that I have my doubts about it being a good measurement.I respectfully totally disagree.
No matter the sample size, and individual's plus/minus will always be overwhelmingly affected by the performance of the other 4 players the individual has been on the court with. Put me on the court for 50 games with LeBron, Embid, Curry, and Tatum and my plus/minus will be outstanding. Put me on the court for 50 games with 4 fat/slow/short guys and my plus/minus will suck. In either situation, I'm the same player, but my plus/minus is determined NOT by me, but by who I'm on the court with.
This is my earlier postI respectfully totally disagree.
No matter the sample size, and individual's plus/minus will always be overwhelmingly affected by the performance of the other 4 players the individual has been on the court with. Put me on the court for 50 games with LeBron, Embid, Curry, and Tatum and my plus/minus will be outstanding. Put me on the court for 50 games with 4 fat/slow/short guys and my plus/minus will suck. In either situation, I'm the same player, but my plus/minus is determined NOT by me, but by who I'm on the court with.
Their big was 2-14 from three this season, and tape basically said back off and let him shoot, so of course he went 3-6 from there.Illinois came into the game hitting 62.2% of their free throws, and hit 24-28 on the night, for right at 86%. According to “history” they should have hit 7 less than they made.
Tennessee came in at 76.2 % and winds up the night hitting 76.5%. Started out pretty slowly but came around in the end.
Go figure….it’s college basketball.
I wish him the best. He’s earned it!In today's world of college basketball it is becoming rare for a kid to stick it through as a bench/role player for multiple years instead of hopping around programs looking for playing time. Mashack has come such a long way. He looked completely confident and in control tonight. His ceiling is really high and it is coming together real nicely for him.
I think 40%+ 3 point percentage is sustainable for a non-volume shooter. A few guys seem to do it every year in the SEC. JMOHe's at 43.8% from 3 which obviously isn't sustainable but if he can hover around 35% while keeping up his FT % considering he was a sub 60% FT prior seasons will be a massive boost for the team.