Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 38,870
- Likes
- 79,033
?
I thought you weren't talking to me because I talked down to the guy who was calling me a boob and an idiot?
Now that we're on speaking terms, I was wondering what you think about the free movement of people, since you claim libertarianism?
Some body called you a boob and an idiot? What is the world coming to??
I thought you weren't talking to me because I talked down to the guy who was calling me a boob and an idiot?
Now that we're on speaking terms, I was wondering what you think about the free movement of people, since you claim libertarianism?
I believe in sovereign countries and borders. I've laid off the claim to be a libertarian of late since I don't agree with all libertarian policies. That, and there are too many dumbasses calling themselves libertarians. These days I just go with small gov conservative, or occasionally classical liberal.
And I never stopped talking to you. I did leave the conversation when your replies became nothing more than repeatedly calling people bootlickers. Your "he was mean first" excuse meant little in my opinion when he was actually trying to have a discussion and you just wanted to have a meme argument.
And you are an idiot if you think banning something that is an add on to a product is a “Gun Grab “ pure and simple . You claim to be about facts and you are defending a lie . Change your statement or stop whining .
Let's see...repeated ad hominem and repeated semantic arguments that I had already tried to move on from. What part of this do you consider discussion?
My genuine confusion stems from the fact that so many here are completely incapable of valid exchange and you take issue with me because I respond to those types with a meme....
I withdrew from the discussion and told you why. I had no idea I'd wounded you so deeply. I apologize.
I withdrew because you were to the point of not responding, but just posting bootlicker memes. Again, I had no idea you were so invested in my input.
Ad hominems and sticks and stones lolLet's see...repeated ad hominem and repeated semantic arguments that I had already tried to move on from. What part of this do you consider discussion?
My genuine confusion stems from the fact that so many here are completely incapable of valid exchange and you take issue with me because I respond to those types with a meme....
Why are you withdrawing because of the way I speak to somebody who is rude to me? I was having valid discussion with you. I wasn't rude to you. Ironically, you insulted me. This isn't about my feelings. I'm not hurt. I'm curious about your inconsistency here. Do you typically tap out in a discussion where somebody shares a meme?
I'm not sure I tapped out. I guess it just struck me wrong. I had said my piece. Neither of us were going to change their minds, and you were throwing out "bootlicker" memes while he was trying to engage with discussion points. Whatever your discussion had been before I showed up, he was making similar points to me, so I take it your view is that I am a Trump bootlicker as well.
So, if that's your feelings on the matter, where should we go from there? I am comfortable in the cogency of my points. You think those who disagree with you on the subject are merely bootlickers. I'm fine with both.
Let's see...repeated ad hominem and repeated semantic arguments that I had already tried to move on from. What part of this do you consider discussion?
My genuine confusion stems from the fact that so many here are completely incapable of valid exchange and you take issue with me because I respond to those types with a meme....
I think he is. Of course I don't think all people who excuse the bump stock ban are Trump bootlickers. They might be TL's, but they might just be anti-2A, or they might be indifferent to 2A, or they might not care about checks and balances when POTUS has his AG to just reinterpret the law so he can bypass proper channels.
One thing is for certain, every "small government conservative" I know would be spitting mad if Obama did this. I'm not gonna call you a TL because you don't have the posting history that onelilreb does, but your position is a little shocking.
I said that I am disgusted with Trump for this and find it a betrayal of his conservative base. I just also understand the reasoning of those who find a distinction between this and a gun grab, as you phrased it.I think he is. Of course I don't think all people who excuse the bump stock ban are Trump bootlickers. They might be TL's, but they might just be anti-2A, or they might be indifferent to 2A, or they might not care about checks and balances when POTUS has his AG to just reinterpret the law so he can bypass proper channels.
One thing is for certain, every "small government conservative" I know would be spitting mad if Obama did this. I'm not gonna call you a TL because you don't have the posting history that onelilreb does, but your position is a little shocking.
Easy to run back across without a wall.Illegal Alien Felon Accused of Aiding Alleged Cop Killer was Deported Twice
![]()
Two illegal aliens accused of aiding and abetting an illegal alien who allegedly murdered a Newman, California, police officer both had prior run-ins with the law.
Gustavo Perez Arriaga, an illegal alien living in California, was arrested on Friday after he allegedly shot and killed Singh — a legal immigrant from Fiji — during a routine traffic stop the day after Christmas.
Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson says California’s “sanctuary state” law “provided sanctuary” for the accused killer, Perez Arriaga. Police said Perez Arriaga was a “known” gang member who plotted to flee across the U.S.-Mexico border after the killing. The illegal alien allegedly crossed into the U.S. through Arizona a couple of years ago.
Illegal Alien Accused of Aiding Alleged Cop Killer was Deported Twice
This is a slap to the face of every New Yorker convicted of drug crimes. I’ve once again been proven correct in that these liberals care more about foreigners than they do Americans.Cuomo knocks Trump in announcing PARDONS for 22 immigrants
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) announced pardons on Monday for 22 immigrants who were at risk of deportation because of CRIMINAL records, taking a swipe at President Trump in the process.
In addition to the pardons, Cuomo commuted the sentences of seven people currently serving jail time.
Cuomo knocks Trump in announcing pardons for 22 immigrants
Do those free moving people that you are so enamored with get to avail themselves of government financial support??
I thought you weren't talking to me because I talked down to the guy who was calling me a boob and an idiot?
Now that we're on speaking terms, I was wondering what you think about the free movement of people, since you claim libertarianism?