I'd rather lose by 13 percent than 13 votes. At least if you lose by 13 percent you could let it go and move on.
No doubt. Same goes for the winner. When it's this close, many people (fairly or not) will have doubts about the legitimacy of the outcome. Bush dealt with that in the aftermath of the 2000 election, and I can't even imagine the outrage we would've seen if the recount had continued and Gore been declared the winner.
The stakes in this recount are so much lower than in 2000. The 2000 recount process was highly politicized from the inside out, and their were multiple competing legal and political authorities (Secretary of State Katherine Harris, Florida Legislature, Florida Supreme Court, and ultimately the US Supreme Court).
In Minnesota, there is very clear statute as to the process for recounts. Everything has been very "Minnesota nice" since the process began. No doubt, both sides are playing some hardball with the challenge ballots, but seems more like a game of working the refs than actual attempt to overturn the will of the voters.
Honestly, I'm more interested in the underlying social psychology and the general media play of the whole event. The whole process behind one candidate, their supporters, and the general public believing in a certain result based on a initial projection which turns out to be premature, or simply wrong... that's interesting to me.