If an airplane broke apart before hitting the water, wouldn't it be likely that there would be some floating debris?
I didn't know people were trying to illegally immigrate to Beijing.If 2-3 terrorists boarded the plane to somehow make it crash:
1) why is no one taking responsibility;
2) assuming they blew it up such that there was no communication of a problem, why did they have to be on the plane at all;
3) if it was to take over the plane then shouldn't there have been a communication?
Really does not make sense as terrorism. Seems more likely they were attempting illegal immigration.
If 2-3 terrorists boarded the plane to somehow make it crash:
1) why is no one taking responsibility;
2) assuming they blew it up such that there was no communication of a problem, why did they have to be on the plane at all;
3) if it was to take over the plane then shouldn't there have been a communication?
Really does not make sense as terrorism. Seems more likely they were attempting illegal immigration.
Maybe no one is saying anything because it was a dry run of sorts and they found a new way to take down planes? With visas that were stolen years ago, this has clearly been planned out for a while. I think this was a test to see if they could pull it off. There's no way this wasn't the results of terrorist actions.