Volfan2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 34,679
- Likes
- 64,695
The analysis left one important factor out, the level of the competition.
Run the stats contrasting our OOC schedule vs the conference games. Then you will have a more realistic representation of who is effective, in games against good competition that count, and who isn't.
We know that Nared is around 30 percent in conference play. She did all her damage in non conference play before Notre Dame. Russell has been very effective on offense when she gets the ball but if you counted all the fumbled passes and mis-direction passes in her direction probably would throw her down with Nared in efficiency. If you throw ten turnovers her way during a game her 65 percent shooting doesn't mean much because those ten turnovers are like 10 missed shots. That is why if you don't have a reasonable way to get it to her someone else needs to shoot we can't keep letting teams get up 15 to 20 shots more than we do in a game.
Truth is since conference play began we have been flat on defense and offense. We had to pull out a game late against Auburn and Vandy. Held on at SC after playing what has been our best conference performance. We played decent at Kentucky but they are terrible should have destroyed them.
Ole Miss coming in if that is a close game were still in a rut should win by over 20.