Mississippi State

[SeanJean]

You made the point that the difference between UK and MSU was upper and underclassmen.

I'll leave the argument at that, but while I do agree MSU is talented and has underachieved, they aren't really even close to the talent talent at Florida, us or Kentucky. Any argument you make for MSU the same can be said for those teams, and for more players.

 

[omghulkhands]

You made the point that the difference between UK and MSU was upper and underclassmen.

I'll leave the argument at that, but while I do agree MSU is talented and has underachieved, they aren't really even close to the talent talent at Florida, us or Kentucky. Any argument you make for MSU the same can be said for those teams, and for more players.

What are you even suggesting? I don't quite follow you and/or think you misunderstood the point I was trying to make. UK has 3 talented freshman: Jones, Knight and Lamb While MSU has 3 talented upperclassman: Johnson, Bost and Augustus

I see no disparity unless you disagree and you gave no specific examples

 

[SeanJean]

What are you even suggesting? I don't quite follow you and/or think you misunderstood the point I was trying to make. UK has 3 talented freshman: Jones, Knight and Lamb While MSU has 3 talented upperclassman: Johnson, Bost and Augustus

I see no disparity unless you disagree and you gave no specific examples

They also have DeAndre Liggins, and Darius Miller, who are both very talented upperclassmen. Not to mention those 3 underclassmen are wildly more talented than MSU's upperclassmen.

Kentucky is arguably one of the 3 or 4 most talented teams in the country, much less the SEC.

 

[SeanJean]

News flash: We don't roll anybody (and don't anybody bring up Pitt or Nova). It will be a close game, because that's all we know how to play. Hopefully we pull it out in the end and play smart.

Wishful thinking. Of course we lost.