Missouri at South Carolina

#51
#51
So Missouri did to South Carolina what South Carolina did to Missouri last year, I guess.

Except neither of these teams will be looking at any national or SEC championship implications at the end of the year.
 
#55
#55
rjd970 said:
Mizzou wins. The east is officially a cluster.
Click to expand...

I'm not saying we win the East but the way everyone has played to this point we have as good of a chance as anyone. UGA clearly has the upper hand at this point holding the tiebreaker over us and being a game ahead of USC but it's potentially a 6 team race. Before it's all said and done UK will play spoiler and have a major hand in jumbling the East even more I believe.
 
#57
#57
South Carolina's ranking should drop like a rock. They are 1-2 in sec play and that one being against the worst teAm in the conference by a mile.
 
#63
#63
Anybody able to make out what the crowd was chanting as time expired? I'm sure it was entertaining.
 
#67
#67
508mikey said:
maybe Kentucky can beat UGA :loco:
Click to expand...

UK always plays UGA tough, fwiw. Actually beat them between the hedges a few years back. Couldn't have surprised me more if I'd woken up with my head sewn to the carpet.
 
#69
#69
Brian McCat said:
UK always plays UGA tough, fwiw. Actually beat them between the hedges a few years back. Couldn't have surprised me more if I'd woken up with my head sewn to the carpet.
Click to expand...

2009?

Yeah that was a weird game. UGA turned the ball over like 4 times in the second half and UK scored 21 unanswered points in like the last 20 [clock] minutes of the game.
 
#71
#71
TrueOrange said:
Guess that leaves Arkansas?
Click to expand...

Thats a possibility.

How does it work if the following scenario played out?

UGA/UT have same east record with UGA holding the tiebreaker, but UT has the better overall conference record.

Does UT get in the SECCG, even though UGA holds the tiebreaker in the east?

I legitimately don't know.
 
#72
#72
rjd970 said:
Thats a possibility.

How does it work if the following scenario played out?

UGA/UT have same east record with UGA holding the tiebreaker, but UT has the better overall conference record.

Does UT get in the SECCG, even though UGA holds the tiebreaker in the east?

I legitimately don't know.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure the overall conference record is all that matters.
 
#73
#73
rjd970 said:
Thats a possibility.

How does it work if the following scenario played out?

UGA/UT have same east record with UGA holding the tiebreaker, but UT has the better overall conference record.

Does UT get in the SECCG, even though UGA holds the tiebreaker in the east?

I legitimately don't know.
Click to expand...

Whoever has the least conference losses is automatically in. If we're 6-2 and UGA is 5-3 we're in, assuming that's what you're asking.
 
#74
#74
rjd970 said:
Thats a possibility.

How does it work if the following scenario played out?

UGA/UT have same east record with UGA holding the tiebreaker, but UT has the better overall conference record.

Does UT get in the SECCG, even though UGA holds the tiebreaker in the east?

I legitimately don't know.
Click to expand...

Conference record always trumps division record.

If it were just based on division record, the East and West might as well be completely different conferences since the games between the two really wouldn't matter in the scheme of things.

(Although Spurrier would be in favor of such a set up).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top