TNHopeful505
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 11,454
- Likes
- 20,608
Just like the national VQ guy doubting us on Tate, even with AP in the same thread as him.247 did an article on the top uncommitted players, and had it 50/50 with us and USC for him.
Had Burley 100% to Clemson.
Didn't even have us as a school for Mauigoa. Fools.
national guys' opinions are bloated bags of Farrell.Just like the national VQ guy doubting us on Tate, even with AP in the same thread as him.
Apparently, for whatever reason, these national guys hardly even get the opinions of the local guys. Maybe they're afraid of spin, but it starts to just become a vague, useless opinion when you just ignore the boots on the ground at the local level. Silly.
But to be fair, the "100% on Burley" is only based on CBs. Those usually lag real-time info, because it only relies on people putting in new CBs or changing their old one...when most people are pretty conservative about placing them to begin with.
The funny part is the two predictions for Bradley, one for us and one for USC, come from Wisconsin insider and Oklahoma insider. Neither team being strongly considered, so probably very little insider info.247 did an article on the top uncommitted players, and had it 50/50 with us and USC for him.
Had Burley 100% to Clemson.
Didn't even have us as a school for Mauigoa. Fools.
Someone can correct me, but I don’t think he has visited here yet. I believe he is set to come in for the big Memorial Day weekend event though.247 shows he's only received an offer from UT while he's got an offer from TAM, unofficially visited TAM and has already scheduled an official to TAM the week they play UM.
Is that inaccurate or something?