Non-Jewish Arabs were forcibly evicted from West Jerusalem in 1948-49.
Moreover, the Jews claimed, commandeered, and marked off the historical grazing lands throughout the region; this land was, for thousands of years, the path of Arab nomads, who we now refer to as Palestinians. Again, we might as well say that the US did not take any land from the Sioux and the Comanche, since those were nomadic tribes.
Finally, the end-goal of Zionism is to rebuild the Temple; this, of course, involves destroying the Dome of the Rock.
What is a Jewish Arab? I've not heard that expression nor have I ever heard of an eviction from West Jerusalem, where did you read that?
Arab nomads mostly disappeared during the Turkish Ottoman occupation. You are talking about a few score or a few hundred people out of millions at most.
Jews were evicted from all the surrounding moslems states when Israel became a nation in 1948 even though the Arabs had all agreed to a Jewish state in 1919.
All the Jews property was confiscated.
In 1948 the moslem imams began telling all their followers to leave Israel so the surrounding Arab states could destroy the Jews, most left although Israel still has about 25% Arabs who live in peace with equal rights in every way to Jews. (perhaps that most of those Arabs are Christian is why they are able to live in peace.)
The Arab states invaded Israel in 1949 and occupied Judea and Samaria and East Jerusalem for 19 years until 1967. They renamed the area the 'west bank' of Jordan and destroyed all the signs of previous occupation by Christians and Jews, even going so far as to dig up graves and use them for latrines, they destroyed tombs that were over 2,000 years old.
BTW, there is no Sioux tribe, they call themselves Lakota, and there is a big difference, the Jews were returning to their traditional homeland, not so on the Great Plains of America.
So what if the Dome of the Rock is destroyed, you can't begin to number the Churches, Temples and Synagogs in the world that have been destroyed by moslems.
No we support freedom, democracy, and free voting. The Egyptians wanted Mursi and the Brotherhood and they got them. What right do we, as Americans, have to say they can't? I thought we stood for those ideals but I guess only when our preferred candidate wins.
I've not said the Egyptians should not elect whomever they wish, I will say only an utter fool would be even slightly surprised the MB won both the parliament and presidency.
Now, there will be some ramifications from overthrowing Mubarak. Egypt will become increasingly like theocratic Iran with all that entails in the field of world politics and America's own national security, and if you think elections will ever be on the level after the MB becomes entrenched, then you are even more foolish than I have previously thought.
If they can make it four years to another election, I think well see a liberal make it in. Everything I've heard said that a liberal candidate could have won it this time, but there were too many in the field to get one in the runoff.
I doubt the Egyptians would be better off, even it they had a 'liberal' president.