More Climate BS...

[Orangeburst]

So is banning it

Never seen anyone so admant about losing a freedom of choice as the freedom to eat bugs and lab meat. Knock youself out.

 

[utvolpj]

Never seen anyone so admant about losing a freedom of choice as the freedom to eat bugs and lab meat. Knock youself out.

Never seen someone so clueless about why it matters

 

[Orangeburst]

Never seen someone so clueless about why it matters

enjoy ur bugs

 

[Orangeburst]

this isnt about alternative..it is about replacement..just like EVs

 

[PEPPERJAX]

enjoy ur bugs

The night food markets in Thailand have some tasty insects.

 

[StarRaider]

So is banning it

where did lab grown meat get banned?

 

[utvolpj]

where did lab grown meat get banned?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/05/14/lab-grown-meat-ban-alabama-florida/

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[marcusluvsvols]

Love that stupid term...Climate Deniers. Nah...nobody i know denies that Earth has a climate. Pretty simple to understand that. There are thankfully lots of folks that deny the grift over mankinds contributions to cyclical changes in our climate though...or the lack thereof.

She might be the worst spokesman in WH history. Probably the worst in my lifetime anyway. Kayleigh McEnany is definitely a tough act to follow though. Sure shes pretty...but thats pretty common among conservative women. Unlike the wildebeasts on the Dimwit side of the Uniparty. What is most impressive about Kayleigh though is she was both knowledgeable and has a quick wit...she flat ran circles around the pack of ignorant hyenas that is the WH press corps from the liberal MSM. It was hilarious watching her paddle their butts red day after day.

 

[LouderVol]

I miss glass bottles. Everything tasted better.

real sugar cane too.

 

[LouderVol]

No, I didn't, because I know I don't know the nuanced science of it. I am educated and experienced enough to know there isn't any absolutes of the science of climate change. I do know what I have experienced and witnessed isn't a result SOLELY of natural climate change. Not even close

just interested about how you KNOW this.

 

[85SugarVol]

just interested about how you KNOW this.

Hey! Those experiences are personal!

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[McDad]

Well, the oceans had a good run. Billions of years, if you believe in that timeline.

RIP oceans.

 

[85SugarVol]

Well, the oceans had a good run. Billions of years, if you believe in that timeline.

RIP oceans.

Imma shed TWO tears - the oceans need them more than I.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Vol423]

just interested about how you KNOW this.

Al Gore told him.

 

[Orangeburst]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/03/07/ai-data-centers-power/

AI and the boom in clean-tech manufacturing are pushing America’s power grid to the brink. Utilities can’t keep up.

the irony.

 

[marcusluvsvols]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/03/07/ai-data-centers-power/

AI and the boom in clean-tech manufacturing are pushing America’s power grid to the brink. Utilities can’t keep up.

the irony.

Just like CA mandating electric cars only after 2030. We all know that theres no way they produce the power to charge them. Zero % chance.

1 of you guys need to partner with me on a dealership selling the streamlined little Honda generators that you can carry like suitcase. In California. Store opens 2030 or sooner. We will make millions. All those Teslas, Prius, etc will be driving around with little Honda generators in the trunks to charge them. Somebody is gonna make all that $$$. Why not us? Let me know fellas.
Sell a million of these:

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[hog88]

But that's different. Don't be messing with the elite.

 

[GroverCleveland]

Something about that does not make sense to me and maybe someone here can explain it:

How does that jet, on that trip, generate 58 metric tonnes of CO2? That is almost 64 US tons. That is 127,000lbs. If the entire weight of fuel consumed was converted to CO2, Her jet burns approximately 4000lbs the first hour and 2250lbs once at cruising altitude.

That trip was two takeoffs. If the ENTIRE fuel load used by the plane was 127,000 lbs as claimed, they would have been cruising around the Pacific Ocean for almost 53 hours. Somehow, I just don't think that plane is that slow. And this is assuming the entire weight of the fuel was converted to CO2.

I still think she is a damned hypocrite with regards to extolling how everyone has to sacrifice to save the planet and then doing this kind of stuff, but bad propaganda is bad propaganda.

 

[Orangeburst]

Something about that does not make sense to me and maybe someone here can explain it:

How does that jet, on that trip, generate 58 metric tonnes of CO2? That is almost 64 US tons. That is 127,000lbs. If the entire weight of fuel consumed was converted to CO2, Her jet burns approximately 4000lbs the first hour and 2250lbs once at cruising altitude.

That trip was two takeoffs. If the ENTIRE fuel load used by the plane was 127,000 lbs as claimed, they would have been cruising around the Pacific Ocean for almost 53 hours. Somehow, I just don't think that plane is that slow. And this is assuming the entire weight of the fuel was converted to CO2.

I still think she is a damned hypocrite with regards to extolling how everyone has to sacrifice to save the planet and then doing this kind of stuff, but bad propaganda is bad propaganda.

You are forgetting the Oxygen atoms

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/contentincludes/co2_inc.htm

 

[GroverCleveland]

You are forgetting the Oxygen atoms

https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/contentincludes/co2_inc.htm

Thank you very much. So it has been 44 years since Chemistry 121 and I have just displayed how little I've used it since.