Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 45,583
- Likes
- 62,608
The question was asked earlier if the Dems. have done something like this. I'm curious about the answer to that question. Knowing the usual suspect, eager to point out "but the Dems", it's odd they haven't provided anything. Not saying it's not happened, just haven't seen anything.It is always fine when it is your Klan.
The question was asked earlier if the Dems. have done something like this. I'm curious about the answer to that question. Knowing the usual suspect, eager to point out "but the Dems", it's odd they haven't provided anything. Not saying it's not happened, just haven't seen anything.
No sh!t, Hillary isn't the president because of the resistance. Do you not see that?
You said “SUBVERTING” the will of the people . Voting for one of the other isn’t resistance , it’s called a choice . The outcome of the election is THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE . #RESISTING the elected Governor because your diaper is wet and you don’t like him , is subverting the will of the people . It’s a simple concept .
You screeching that the liberals are the resisters and you don't have a working definition of #resist. You might have to define your working definition of resist. How have the Dems subverted the will of the people. I'll wait.You can put governor if you want , doesn’t change my original post one bit . Like I said , Liberals screeching about subverting the will of the people is comical .
You screeching that the liberals are the resisters and you don't have a working definition of #resist. You might have to define your working definition of resist. How have the Dems subverted the will of the people. I'll wait.
I take it from all the the beating around the bush you're doing and you're false equivalency to whatever you consider #resist, you're cool with what the Republicans are doing in Wisconsin?Your original post asked if red hats or Republicans were ok with subverting the will of the people ...
View attachment 180881
I said it’s comical coming from liberals .
I take it from all the the beating around the bush you're doing, you're cool with what the Republicans are doing in Wisconsin?
Wisconsin governors have the most expansive partial veto power in the country because, unlike in other states, they can strike nearly any part of a budget bill. That includes wiping out numbers, punctuation and words in spending bills to sometimes create new law that wasn’t the intention of the Legislature.
Didn't know where else to put this.
Apparently WI governors have unlimited line item veto power, they aren't limited to just striking parts of a bill they can rewrite the whole thing, do partial rewrites or whatever they want to do. So the question is why do they even have a legislature if the executive has that much power?
MSN