Most hated non-SEC teams

#27
#27
Originally posted by hatvol96@Jul 11, 2005 10:35 PM
It amazes me that so many posters hate success.
[snapback]112668[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



Well...it's not like we can hate failure. How cruel would it be to hate Kentucky, Vandy, and University of Central Florida? They're too pathetic to hate. :laugh1:


~*Crystal*~
 
#28
#28
Seriously... I can understand Miami, but Tennessee has no recent history with USC. It's just jealousy.
 
#29
#29
Haven't been real fond of Miami since '85.

Never liked Notre Dame, even less so after last year.

Oklahoma has some d!ckhead fans, but they get punked good about once a year so I can deal with them.

I'd like to hate Michigan but they have a great program, I'm sure my feelings would be stronger if we hadn't embarrassed them on 1/1/02.
 
#30
#30
Originally posted by Vol 4 Life@Jul 11, 2005 10:43 PM
Haven't been real fond of Miami since '85.

Never liked Notre Dame, even less so after last year.

Oklahoma has some d!ckhead fans, but they get punked good about once a year so I can deal with them.

I'd like to hate Michigan but they have a great program, I'm sure my feelings would be stronger if we hadn't embarrassed them on 1/1/02.
[snapback]112674[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Someone living in Austin should certainly be familiar with punkings where OU is concerned. The Sooners certainly deal the Shorthorns one annually.
 
#32
#32
Originally posted by hatvol96@Jul 11, 2005 10:48 PM
Someone living in Austin should certainly be familiar with punkings where OU is concerned. The Sooners certainly deal the Shorthorns one annually.
[snapback]112676[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


Yep, and I enjoy my ringside seat.
 
#33
#33
Originally posted by hatvol96@Jul 11, 2005 11:48 PM
Someone living in Austin should certainly be familiar with punkings where OU is concerned. The Sooners certainly deal the Shorthorns one annually.
[snapback]112676[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


Yes but the Sooners tend to take their punkings in a game that we all call the "National Championship game."
 
#34
#34
I tell people....I loved Oklahoma....until the 2003 Sugar Bowl....where I had just a horrible time with them.

Had 4 different experiences with OU fans acting just horrible
 
#35
#35
Originally posted by GoVolsDogg@Jul 12, 2005 2:57 PM
Yes but the Sooners tend to take their punkings in a game that we all call the "National Championship game."
[snapback]112902[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

I'll take losses in Championship Games over our recent litany of Peach Bowl disasters anyday.
 
#36
#36
Originally posted by hatvol96@Jul 12, 2005 3:36 PM
I'll take losses in Championship Games over our recent litany of Peach Bowl disasters anyday.
[snapback]112914[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


We stunk up those games quite honestly because we didn't care enough. How can OU not put up a good show for the NC and Big 12 Championship game ('03)?
 
#37
#37
Originally posted by Vol 4 Life@Jul 12, 2005 7:35 PM
We stunk up those games quite honestly because we didn't care enough.  How can OU not put up a good show for the NC and Big 12 Championship game ('03)?
[snapback]112981[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

USC was simply that much better last year. The LSU game was essentially a road game with a battered Jason White at QB. The K-State performance was simply awful, but OU was almost assured of a BCS Championship Game berth regardless of the outcome. My point is simply that Oklahoma takes a great deal of heat on this board for failing in situations that very few teams are able to earn their way into.
 
#38
#38
Originally posted by hatvol96@Jul 12, 2005 9:45 PM
USC was simply that much better last year. The LSU game was essentially a road game with a battered Jason White at QB. The K-State performance was simply awful, but OU was almost assured of a BCS Championship Game berth regardless of the outcome. My point is simply that Oklahoma takes a great deal of heat on this board for failing in situations that very few teams are able to earn their way into.
[snapback]113010[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


No way was USC that much better last year, USC was not that dominate and was outplayed by VT, Cal, Stanford and UCLA.

It was a 50/50 shot at who would win the title, with the edge being to OU even, and they got handed big time.
 
#39
#39
Originally posted by GoVolsDogg@Jul 12, 2005 7:23 PM
No way was USC that much better last year, USC was not that dominate and was outplayed by VT, Cal, Stanford and UCLA.

It was a 50/50 shot at who would win the title, with the edge being to OU even, and they got handed big time.
[snapback]113028[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

I agree somewhat, although I was rooting for USC. I thought Oklahoma was by far the most dominant team in last year's regular season. I mean, how many times do you see one team playing for a conference championship held to just 59 yards. Some of us couldn't pull that off on NCAA '06. But, about USC; I don't think they were 'outplayed' and the only game they got lucky with was Cal. Stanford and UCLA played them close, yes, but USC still flat-out performed better and won. I also get tired of the USC-hating on here. Tennessee has no recent history with the Trojans, and any dissing on them is pure jealousy. It's pretty much player-hating, 'cause USC is the biggest and best player in the game right now.
 
#40
#40
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 12, 2005 10:51 PM
I agree somewhat, although I was rooting for USC. I thought Oklahoma was by far the most dominant team in last year's regular season. I mean, how many times do you see one team playing for a conference championship held to just 59 yards. Some of us couldn't pull that off on NCAA '06. But, about USC; I don't think they were 'outplayed' and the only game they got lucky with was Cal. Stanford and UCLA played them close, yes, but USC still flat-out performed better and won. I also get tired of the USC-hating on here. Tennessee has no recent history with the Trojans, and any dissing on them is pure jealousy. It's pretty much player-hating, 'cause USC is the biggest and best player in the game right now.
[snapback]113036[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


Virginia Tech had them on opening game until the refs decided that there was a phantom offensive pass interference to be called that killed the Hokies momentum.

Stanford wiped the floor with USC in the first half of that game, a big 2nd half comeback by USC kept the title hopes alive.

UCLA game was just a bad played game by both teams, UCLA had it's opportunities and failed to covnert them, both teams were just flat.

USC wasn't dominant, they won games and they did the necessary things to sneak by, but OU looked to be the better and more dominant of teams last year.

About the USC hating, I don't like USC and never have and its for a different reason than Tennessee. I also don't like OU, or any of the Big 12 teams for that matter, so to me last year's championship game was a lose-lose situation for me.
 
#41
#41
Originally posted by GoVolsDogg@Jul 13, 2005 12:55 PM
Virginia Tech had them on opening game until the refs decided that there was a phantom offensive pass interference to be called that killed the Hokies momentum.
Click to expand...

Well, then I guess we won the SEC Title and lost to Florida too because of the bad officiating in those games. Bad calls happen, and unfortunately they can change the momentum of games. But a win is a win.

Stanford wiped the floor with USC in the first half of that game, a big 2nd half comeback by USC kept the title hopes alive.
Click to expand...

Second half comeback? We had to make a comeback against Kentucky. Does that mean we got beat by them?

UCLA game was just a bad played game by both teams, UCLA had it's opportunities and failed to covnert them, both teams were just flat.
Click to expand...

So UCLA didn't do the things it needed to win. When that happens, the other team usually gets the win. That's how football works.

USC wasn't dominant, they won games and they did the necessary things to sneak by, but OU looked to be the better and more dominant of teams last year.
Click to expand...

I don't know about you, but I call "Doing the necessary things to sneak by" winning. If teams didn't try to do that, they'd probably lose. Good for USC.

I will, however, agree that Oklahoma looked better than any other team after the regular season last year.
 
#42
#42
I am not a big Auburn fan. But after the Ohio State/Miami game...no one should ever say that "Auburn would NEVER have beaten USC"

I am not sure one person on this earth, not an immediate OSU fan, thought OSU had a remote chance of even staying with Miami that night
 
#43
#43
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 11, 2005 4:58 PM
When a team is .932 over three seasons with two AP National Titles, they deserve every bit of media coverage they get. That's just jealousy.
[snapback]112494[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


The question was, who is my most hated non-SEC rival. It didn't say there has to be conditions on my hatred.

AND...when TN was making it's run for the National Championship, we never got that much coverage. In fact, at the end of that game, they made a bigger deal about the announcer guy (sorry, forgot his name) retiring than the win. AND HE DIDN'T EVEN RETIRE - he's still freakin calling games!

:wacko: :wacko:
 
#44
#44
You're entitled to your opinion. It's just that anybody hating on USC right now just sounds jealous to me. USC's goal, like every other team in the country, is to win games. That's all they are doing. They're not cheating I don't think they'll be going on probation, so what's the deal? They've legitimately put themselves on top. I respect that.
 
#45
#45
Originally posted by U-T@Jul 13, 2005 1:05 PM
I am not a big Auburn fan. But after the Ohio State/Miami game...no one should ever say that "Auburn would NEVER have beaten USC"
[snapback]113242[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

Agreed. I would have put my money on USC if that was the national title game, but we won't know.
 
#46
#46
It's not jealousy for me . . . I just have never been fond of Pete Carroll. I don't know what it is, but it dates back to his NFL days.
 
#47
#47
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 13, 2005 4:02 PM
Well, then I guess we won the SEC Title and lost to Florida too because of the bad officiating in those games. Bad calls happen, and unfortunately they can change the momentum of games. But a win is a win.
Second half comeback? We had to make a comeback against Kentucky. Does that mean we got beat by them?
So UCLA didn't do the things it needed to win. When that happens, the other team usually gets the win. That's how football works.
I don't know about you, but I call "Doing the necessary things to sneak by" winning. If teams didn't try to do that, they'd probably lose. Good for USC.

I will, however, agree that Oklahoma looked better than any other team after the regular season last year.
[snapback]113240[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


I did a quick rundown of my posts, never once said that USC was beaten because of those calls or in those games.

I said DOMINATE, USC was weither outplayed(Cal,VT) or didn't dominate(UCLA, Stanford), they weren't the dominant team that they played like in the title game against Oklahoma.

Yes, doing the necessary things to sneak by is winning, I once again never denied that. But if I asked you if USC dominated Stanford or Cal, I'm sure you would say no(Same for if I asked you if Tennessee dominated Vandy and Kentucky, I'm sure most people wouldn't say yes to that one.)
 
#48
#48
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 13, 2005 5:24 PM
You're entitled to your opinion. It's just that anybody hating on USC right now just sounds jealous to me. USC's goal, like every other team in the country, is to win games. That's all they are doing. They're not cheating I don't think they'll be going on probation, so what's the deal? They've legitimately put themselves on top. I respect that.
[snapback]113256[/snapback]​
Click to expand...



Yes Milo, believe it or not many people don't like USC.

I for one, think USC gets WAY to much hype. They have had a nice run, no doubt and I know you don't agree but the PAC-10 is not as strong as the SEC..period. And let's not forget that before Pete Carroll got there you have to go all the way back to 1988 since they won 10 games. It's not the same, no one even cares about college football over there. They can't even come close to filling up their own stadium with the run they have had.
 
#49
#49
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 13, 2005 5:24 PM
You're entitled to your opinion. It's just that anybody hating on USC right now just sounds jealous to me.
[snapback]113256[/snapback]​
Click to expand...

I will admit that I'm jealous of USC. I'm jealous that they get to play in an easy conference and everything about them gets blown out of proportion because they dominated a PAC 10 team. ;)
 
#50
#50
Originally posted by milohimself@Jul 11, 2005 11:40 PM
Seriously... I can understand Miami, but Tennessee has no recent history with USC. It's just jealousy.
[snapback]112672[/snapback]​
Click to expand...


Jealousy? You have got to be kidding me right? Of course anyone would be jealous of the run they have had the last couple of years but let's not go labeling them a dynasty or anything just yet. USC has had some terrible years in the recent past in what has been one of the WORST conferences around. In the last 15 years the PAC-10 has had token champions, a team here and a team there. SOMEONE has to win it.

I will say that USC has had quite the run the past 2-3 years but the previous 15 years had been without a ten win season like I said before. You will never convince me or any other rational football fan that the PAC10 is in the same class with the SEC. Obvioulsy if we put it to a vote on this board, most people would agree with me. :p
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top