I tought OU did have to forfiet some games? Or did they reverse it?
How'd that appeal mentioned in the title turn out? Oh, that's right. Like 109 of the 133 games Bob Stoops has coached, OU was victorious.They did according to this article.
NCAA: Oklahoma must vacate 2005 season; Sooners to appeal - College Football - ESPN
If any of those, or another equally bizarre scenario, takes Mitchell off the LSU roster prior to the start of the season, the bet is a wash. The spirit of the bet wouldn't make it fair for me to collect on that. If Benetton Traveiso or someone offers him a bunch of money and he rethinks his decision, yes. If something that would fall into An Act Of God clause in an insurance policy happens, no.It's not yet time for payout. The bet was whether or not Mitchell would be on LSU's roster next season....so, technically, the $500 wouldn't be due until LSU starts the 2009-2010 season. If Mitchell gets dismissed, joins a wacko religious cult, or falls down an elevator shaft, VK owes Hat 50 Alex Hamiltons.
That thread is funny as heck - especially knowing the outcome. VKA is calm and matter-of-fact while Hat is ranting and raving. Classic.
It's not yet time for payout. The bet was whether or not Mitchell would be on LSU's roster next season....so, technically, the $500 wouldn't be due until LSU starts the 2009-2010 season. If Mitchell gets dismissed, joins a wacko religious cult, or falls down an elevator shaft, VK owes Hat 50 Alex Hamiltons.
With the ACT thing, I was quite a douchebag to be honest. Hat and I had an argument over Marvin Williams and Damon Jones that I liked better. But hey, I'll take the compliment.
That thread is funny as heck - especially knowing the outcome. VKA is calm and matter-of-fact while Hat is ranting and raving. Classic.