I'm still asking why we need so many ILBs if we are mostly going to play with 4 DLs and 5 DBs. Does that mean all the LBs will then be ILBs? Maybe in a couple of years y'all will help the cheerleader understand lol.Yea they need to go after some depth at DT n then they might be able to move some other guys around to possibly ILB
Just because outside of Mitchell and Banks everyone else is either a walk on or a freshman pretty much. Ya want one or two more to firm up the depth a little more.I'm still asking why we need so many ILBs if we are mostly going to play with 4 DLs and 5 DBs. Does that mean all the LBs will then be ILBs? Maybe in a couple of years y'all will help the cheerleader understand lol.
Thanks. So we need 2 ILs on the field for most plays? I guess that is what I am asking. If so I understand why we need more.Just because outside of Mitchell and Banks everyone else is either a walk on or a freshman pretty much. Ya want one or two more to firm up the depth a little more.
Kinda feeling like they may not add anyone else though.
Don’t forget Kurt Maggitt.We should have had the best Dline in the country when we had Barnett, Tuttle, Khalil, Phillips, Kongbo, Darrell Taylor, Vickers, Latroy Lewis, Vereen, Andrew Butcher, and Alexis Johnson. All on the roster at the same time.
On paper, we had a DUMB DL. Too bad Butch and Co. couldn't develop.
What’s up with Middleton and Solomon?Definitely worth taking. We need some guys on DL that will be here beyond next season.
You lose Bumphus, Butler, Middleton(already have probably), Solomon(if haven’t already), Blakely
Not much that can come back outside of Thomas, Emerson, Garland, Simmons. I guess you could list Baron, Young and Eason as DE on certain downs.