Mueller Report Imminent

#10,278
#10,278
hjeagle1vol said:
So anyone who is uncharged is suspect/guilty of something? And if he cannot comment, and Mueller set the rules of engagement, then what's the expected outcome?
Click to expand...


He should be allowed to comment about the entire investigation. Attempting to prevent him from talking about Trump is simply unacceptable and should be ignored by the committee and Mueller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#10,279
#10,279
0nelilreb said:
There will be another vote unless Nancy can actually ( again can’t believe I’m saying this ) be the smart one in the room and get them to remember history lessons taught .
Click to expand...
I'm not sure she will try to stop another vote. Depends on what Mueller says and what he refuses to answer (especially if his refusal is based on the DOJ letter sent today)

If he claims that the DOJ will not allow him to answer, that's a green light for an impeachment vote.
 
#10,280
#10,280
By all means, impeach him. I doubt it gets by the Senate, and Trump will remain in office. It'll be spun as more partisan politics and in the end probably bolster Trump's chances in 2020. Brilliant move(<----sarcasm). The Dems are shooting themselves in the foot. Finding a candidate for 2020 should have been the goal all along, and, newsflash, none of the current Dem candidates are that impressive. They have no real platform other than "orange man bad". That may work fine for the dedicated rank and file of the party, but independents want more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#10,282
#10,282
luthervol said:
I'm not sure she will try to stop another vote. Depends on what Mueller says and what he refuses to answer (especially if his refusal is based on the DOJ letter sent today)

If he claims that the DOJ will not allow him to answer, that's a green light for an impeachment vote.
Click to expand...


I agree. That would tip the scales for me.
 
#10,283
#10,283
luthervol said:
I'm not sure she will try to stop another vote. Depends on what Mueller says and what he refuses to answer (especially if his refusal is based on the DOJ letter sent today)

If he claims that the DOJ will not allow him to answer, that's a green light for an impeachment vote.
Click to expand...

And the senate will ? And the American voter will ? History History History . What’s the ole saying about not learning from history ?
 
#10,284
#10,284
volfanhill said:
I have never thought anything would come from this. Still don’t. But I have no problem with him answering any and all questions.
Click to expand...

One would think a two year term investigation and a 300 page report would have gotten the job done. The esteemed Mueller obviously didn’t do it right.

It’s going to be fun to watch. Because this is more of a political circus than face finding mission.
 
#10,285
#10,285
lawgator1 said:
I agree. That would tip the scales for me.
Click to expand...

Lmao “ tip the scales for you” ? You do know in order to make a statement like that on here you would have to erase all of your previous posts and hope everyone suddenly has a brain fart all at once , right ? Tip the scales for him he says 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, tennvols77, Orange_Vol1321 and 1 other person
#10,288
#10,288
lawgator1 said:
He should be allowed to comment about the entire investigation. Attempting to prevent him from talking about Trump is simply unacceptable and should be ignored by the committee and Mueller.
Click to expand...

Why did Mueller himself set the guidelines of no comment beyond the report during his stellar reading of the Weisman memo?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#10,290
#10,290
Weezer said:
By all means, impeach him. I doubt it gets by the Senate, and Trump will remain in office. It'll be spun as more partisan politics and in the end probably bolster Trump's chances in 2020. Brilliant move(<----sarcasm). The Dems are shooting themselves in the foot. Finding a candidate for 2020 should have been the goal all along, and, newsflash, none of the current Dem candidates are that impressive. They have no real platform other than "orange man bad". That may work fine for the dedicated rank and file of the party, but independents want more.
Click to expand...
Did Trump look like a good candidate 16 months before the election? Hell, he didn't look like a good candidate 16 hours before the election. Trump has proven that a candidate not only doesn't have to be "good" candidate, but may actually benefit from being the absolute worst.
 
Last edited:
#10,292
#10,292
luthervol said:
I'm not sure she will try to stop another vote. Depends on what Mueller says and what he refuses to answer (especially if his refusal is based on the DOJ letter sent today)

If he claims that the DOJ will not allow him to answer, that's a green light for an impeachment vote.
Click to expand...
I don’t think the DOJ can stop him from answering since he resigned. He doesn’t work for them and is now a private citizen. Now he may have his own “code” that prevents him from going beyond his report.
 
#10,293
#10,293
luthervol said:
Did Trump look like a good candidate 16 months before the election. Hell, he didn't look like a good candidate 16 hours before the election. Trump has proven that a candidate not only doesn't have to be "good" candidate, but actually benefit from being the absolute worst.
Click to expand...
So that's the new Dem strategy? lmao Let's run a bad candidate and cross our fingers! You've got the bad candidates, guess we'll see how that works out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#10,295
#10,295
0nelilreb said:
And the senate will ? And the American voter will ? History History History . What’s the ole saying about not learning from history ?
Click to expand...
The senate will probably not do their job. I think the American people will.
There is no historical context for Trump.
 
#10,297
#10,297
luthervol said:
The senate will probably not do their job. I think the American people will.
There is no historical context for Trump.
Click to expand...

Lol. My god the house has did absolutely nothing since January except screech and have endless bs hearings. The dims in the HOR are a clown show.
 
#10,298
#10,298
lawgator1 said:
I agree. That would tip the scales for me.
Click to expand...


Good lord, he wrote his report in one month about a 2 year investigation and could say absolutely anything he wanted to about anyone he wanted to . Now you say he is being censored? You guys are hilarious! You just make it up as you go along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, Orange_Vol1321, volfanjustin and 1 other person
#10,300
#10,300
volfanhill said:
I don’t think the DOJ can stop him from answering since he resigned. He doesn’t work for them and is now a private citizen. Now he may have his own “code” that prevents him from going beyond his report.
Click to expand...
It depends. He could have some kind of NDA he had to sign when he left. Becoming a private citizen does not automatically mean you can talk about everything you know legally. The government protects its secrets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top