Mueller Report Imminent

[Burger]

Sure you can. He was obstructing for all of his other crimes.

Like?

 

[Weezer]

Like?

Stealing the election from Hillary. That's what they're really pissed about.

 

[hjeagle1vol]

Sure you can. He was obstructing for all of his other crimes.

? Put'em on the line vs what Mueller says tomorrow? Let's see how accurate your assumptions are shall we?

 

[C-south]

Sure you can. He was obstructing for all of his other crimes.

Hurting your feelings isn’t a crime.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Just a word of advice for our resident democrats as we go into tomorrow....

 

[0nelilreb]

You're proof Trump voters need to have it read to them.

That statement is why in part, Trump was elected . That elitist liberal highbrow attitude towards people that think differently that you do backfired on you and will again because you didn’t learn from it .

 

[volfanhill]

? Put'em on the line vs what Mueller says tomorrow? Let's see how accurate your assumptions are shall we?

He outlined the obstruction. You can argue that it shouldn’t matter bc no underlying crime was found. But obstruction happened. He asked/instructed people to lie.

 

[ajvol01]

I view it like Al Capone's tax evasion.

That’s because you’re very suggestible and the media has repeatedly said Trump was guilty of something and probably going down for the same something for over 2-1/2 years.

The entire thing is an absolute joke. Hoax crimes, hoax investigation that’s now on life support by liberal politicians who know this is the only chance they have of getting Trump out of office.

Enjoy election night 2020 - it’s going to be better than 2016

 

[0nelilreb]

All the dems want is for the American public to be aware of what the report shows instead of the propagandized results immediately reported by Barr and then parroted by every right wing news source.
I bet if you asked a random sample of 1000 redhatters, 95% would say the report said there was no obstruction.

Just trying to chip away at the ignorance.

Fair question .... How many , out of a 1000k randomly selected liberals , would say there was no “ collusion “ between Trump and Russia ?

 

[ajvol01]

For the first hearing, Zebley will sit alongside Mueller as his counsel, according to the Judiciary Committee spokesperson. The committee, however, is not updating its guidance to include Zebley as a witness. This means that Zebley will not be sworn in. Mueller can confer with him as he is questioned by the panel, according to committee rules, but cannot answer questions.

Why does a former Clinton attorney get to testify?

 

[FLVOL_79]

Hurting your feelings isn’t a crime.

It is in their whacky world

 

[NEVolFan]

There’s a reason there were no charges related to Russian collusion filed against Americans.

Also a reason no obstruction charges were filed.

I understand you’d probably like a do over. You took the collusion bait and got excited about it for two years. Sorry for the sore nuts, Mick.

Not me... hope he gets em kicked again.

 

[ajvol01]

Lol - he’s just awesome at this

 

[luthervol]

Fair question .... How many , out of a 1000k randomly selected liberals , would say there was no “ collusion “ between Trump and Russia ?

30% would say no collusion.
50% would say some collusion but no conspiracy
20% would say conspiracy to collude but Mueller did not uncover it.

 

[C-south]

30% would say no collusion.
50% would say some collusion but no conspiracy
20% would say conspiracy to collude but Mueller did not uncover it.

That’s some pretty concrete completely made up numbers. The dim way.

 

[luthervol]

That’s some pretty concrete completely made up numbers. The dim way.

Wasn't he asking for my opinion or did I miss something?

 

[Matt2496]

30% would say no collusion.
50% would say some collusion but no conspiracy
20% would say conspiracy to collude but Mueller did not uncover it.

Wow. The ExtremelyLegitLootherResearchCenter strikes again.

 

[volfanhill]

30% would say no collusion.
50% would say some collusion but no conspiracy
20% would say conspiracy to collude but Mueller did not uncover it.

So 70% think they know more then Mueller? What do they have access to that he doesn’t? Nothing. What did he have access to that they don’t? Tons. So 70%, in your estimation, are basing their beliefs on nothing at all. This is why feelings keep being thrown in your face.

 

[0nelilreb]

30% would say no collusion.
50% would say some collusion but no conspiracy
20% would say conspiracy to collude but Mueller did not uncover it.

Ok so 95% of Trump supporters would say no obstruction but only 30% of liberals would say no collusion ? I thought that’s the one thing the report was very clear on . Did you ever think by continuing the drive to “ enlighten “ that 3-5% of trump supporters you think you need to change an election result , you will drive away 3-5 or even 7% of those liberals that are in that 30% bracket ? That’s going to be a line where you make Trump an underdog and he WILL use that in 2020.

 

[C-south]

Wasn't he asking for my opinion or did I miss something?

He asked you but didn’t clarify if he wanted a made up opinion. He may have been asking for a somewhat rational assessment based on the facts. Then again dims don’t work well with facts.

 

[luthervol]

He asked you but didn’t clarify if he wanted a made up opinion. He may have been asking for a somewhat rational assessment based on the facts. Then again dims don’t work well with facts.

He was aware of what he was asking and from whom.

 

[luthervol]

Ok so 95% of Trump supporters would say no obstruction but only 30% of liberals would say no collusion ? I thought that’s the one thing the report was very clear on . Did you ever think by continuing the drive to “ enlighten “ that 3-5% of trump supporters you think you need to change an election result , you will drive away 3-5 or even 7% of those liberals that are in that 30% bracket ? That’s going to be a line where you make Trump an underdog and he WILL use that in 2020.

Okay, now for your opinions.
What percent of Trump supporters think there was obstruction?
What percent of liberals think there was no collusion?

 

[0nelilreb]

Okay, now for your opinions.
What percent of Trump supporters think there was obstruction?
What percent of liberals think there was no collusion?

I’ll try to answer without it seeming like a cop out . I honestly don’t know , I think it would depend largely on the demographics of the people surveyed . Where they are from , age , what industries they work in . I also believe you’ll have a % of far right and left that will believe what they believe no matter what . The sweet spot is trying to figure out how many everyday American voters are just sick of it all and would rather it just stop . This is where ( in my opinion ) most of the people fall into . That’s also why it would be easy to create the perception that Trump is an underdog fighting against the establishment and you know how we American love to pull for the underdog .

 

[Weezer]

Okay, now for your opinions.
What percent of Trump supporters think there was obstruction?
What percent of liberals think there was no collusion?

Established precedent supports obstruction not being enough to unseat a President. If the goal of the left is to impeach, just go ahead and do it. The problem is they know the GOP controlled Senate won't convict(which precedent supports). The reason they're dragging their feet and playing up the faux outrage is they're hoping to prolong this into campaign season. Their motives are strictly political and in no way pure. The funny thing is how you lap up this crusader schtick. None of it's real. But you're a good sheep and you follow the flock. And that's accepted politics in America. Amazing how so many don't see the problem with that. You're a victim of political theater. The things that really matter continue to go unaddressed.

 

[Weezer]

Okay, now for your opinions.
What percent of Trump supporters think there was obstruction?
What percent of liberals think there was no collusion?

How many Americans are actually free thinkers and how many just parrot whatever biased news source they use to get information? That applies to both sides.