Our administration is only looking at coaches that the market "perceives" as worth 4 million, if that. So your argument of more commitment from UT is more "logical" and mine is not because although UF committed the resources to get and keep a coach of an admitted market value of 7.5 million and are now firing their coach(who beat ours btw) are less committed because, even though we only committed to get and keep a coach of 4 million market value and wasn't desired enough on the open market to command a higher buyout, you think we got "more value"? All of this is based on the perceived momentum of a coach in his first year?? Almost every coach creates momentum in their first year. I hate to spoil your fun, but this admin has not done great with their evaluation of these value coaches over the last 15 years. I'd much rather they rely and commit based on market value and pay the extra money until they get a little better at finding this hidden gems at a bargain price.