There are federal laws and state laws that cause an employer to make reasonable accommodations. So it is not quite that simple. An employee can't simply be forced to go home and not work and call it their "choice." That is not permitted under the law. Whereas, a player that is not an employee could say I don't want to come back because I don't feel safe, there is no law that protects his scholarship. That is why the comparisons fails. This is exactly what the Northwestern athletes were trying to address when they wanted to become a Union. The players don't have any real protection, except for good coaches and administrators that treat them with respect and dignity. They have no power, that is why a good institution will do what it can to protect and cancel the season rather than put them at risk. That is the whole point of this debate that turned sour. People, just expect them to play because we want to be entertained. It is not that easy, there is a legality and morality component to it. So when some simpleton rants about wanting football regardless of what else is going on it's childish.