gsvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2008
- Messages
- 14,179
- Likes
- 10
Let's recap, Gs makes a claim about something that happened last year and links a whackjob blog that links a historical study published seven years ago. I tell gs that, as per usual, he has presented us nothing more than a link to a blog written by loonies, and that I would like a source for his claim. Gs copies and pastes said study FROM 2003. (This is important because the year is 2010). He then says that I claimed that the authors of said study are whackjobs, which I, of course, did not. Still no source, but (and this is also important) I am the moron. Everytime I think he could not possibly test the depths of stupidity and lack of comprehension further, he takes the bar down another notch. Well played gs, you have to work pretty hard to be that clueless.
Endnote 15 is dated August 19, 2010 BTW.
As for testing the depths of stupidity, yours seems
bottomless.
If you think the scholars at MEMRI are whackjobs,
who in the world do you think aren't whackjobs,
the members of your local circle jerk club??
At anyrate I furnished you something even more
current, released this September and those who
compiled the report included a former CIA director,
a former DIA director, two American generals, one
of the top anti-terrorism prosecutors and other well
recognized and respected experts, but then I still
suppose your won't pull your head out, that just
isn't your style.
I've kind of ignored the debated gibbsy has gotten involved in, have these two gone toe to toe yet?
Long time ago.
I will say for giblet, he isn't a dunghill, henpecked
maybe but still that isn't as bad as being a dunghill.
wouldn't matter, we all lose
Nothing new with that.
Different styles. Gs uses others ridiculous ideas. Gibbsy uses his own from what the data suggests.
Why don't you point out one of those ridiculous ideas???
Some are capable of discussing ideas, lesser minds
usually talk about other people as if somehow that
makes them worthy of higher esteem.