Sea Ray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 7,881
- Likes
- 11,037
If you do that you won't have any $400 family plans. In fact that's Obamacare. Very few insurers even want to get into that. The few that do, like Anthem here in Ohio, charge through the nose, $1900/mo
#1 is as stated. #3 adds back one provision of OC that was a good one. Not all of OC sucked. There were some good points. That's one good point I included.
I don't have the ability to crunch numbers. The CBO won't crunch numbers for me so it is a wild ass guess. Understand, the numbers are fluid based on how much you charge people to buy in. Under my plan, very few will need to buy in. 85% already have insurance. Of the 15% many will opt to go with a plan that's underwritten...but the folks with pre-existing conditions will need to avail themselves of this plan
I would love to see an overlay with the tax rates with this. I think this should change people's opinion.You can't just raise taxes and increase tax revenue. That's not the way it works. You might be able to create a blip for a year, but then the top 5% just find loopholes with the new system and revenue as a % of GDP returns back to normal (16-18%).
If you can't raise taxes in order to raise revenue then how do we raise revenue?You can't just raise taxes and increase tax revenue. That's not the way it works. You might be able to create a blip for a year, but then the top 5% just find loopholes with the new system and revenue as a % of GDP returns back to normal (16-18%).
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You can't just raise taxes and increase tax revenue. That's not the way it works. You might be able to create a blip for a year, but then the top 5% just find loopholes with the new system and revenue as a % of GDP returns back to normal (16-18%).