N. Korea fires on S. Korea ...

#51
#51
I heard an interesting opinion today worth considering. Let japan develop a nuclear weapons program and use them to make china control north korea because china wants a nuclear japan about as much as we want a nuclear korea.

If Japan wanted nukes, they could develop them in less than 2 years from scratch.
 
#54
#54
Evidently someone has already mentioned the UN response.

Pundit Press: UN to Give North Korea MORE Aid after Attack on South Korea

Is there any doubt that the United Nations is utterly out of touch with reality and how to get anything done in the real world? As North Korea illegally and aggressively shelled an island in South Korea this week, most rational people believe that the world must get tough on North Korea. Some believe in threats, others suggest boycotts, while others favor arming South Korea. What does the United Nations favor? Giving North Korea more money.

How does this make sense in any way? Obviously it does not, unless you consider appeasement a viable strategy in stopping a belligerent nation. History proves over and over again that appeasement does not work in almost any form, especially not when you give a rogue nation extra money, which they can then use to build weapons.

Anyone read Jimmy Carter's article in today's Washington Post (aka Pravda on the Potomac)?

From what I heard is a bit of self agrandizing on his part in negotiations with NK over the last twenty years.

If I recall correctly it was Bill Clinton, Madeline Albright (or should that be Aldull?) and Jimmy 'the nuclear expert' Carter who were responsible for the North Koreans being nuclear capable in the first place.

Jimmy claimed to be a nuclear whiz since he had served on a nuclear submarine, the biggest problem with that lie is that Carter was out of the Navy two years before we even had a nuclear submarine.
 
#55
#55
If Japan wanted nukes, they could develop them in less than 2 years from scratch.

There would be international backlash though, the NPT treaty is still the rule of thumb on nuclear weapons. There is also the issue of the Japanese constitution. Speaking of which, I'm shocked they haven't amended it yet. I know the Japanese people feel very strongly for it but being located in the area its in I would changed it long ago.

They have shown they can be a valuable ally and international partner and have apologized for their actions during the Second World War. I honestly believe it would be in the best interest for the Japanese and international security to go ahead and change their pacifist constitution and re-militarize.
 
#56
#56
Nobody in their right minds wants Japan to start developing weapons. This is the country that gets kicks out of inventing robot dogs, self flushing and cleaning toilets, and things 1/10th the size of everyone elses that are 1,000 times stronger and better. There is also a reason we dropped not one but two bombs on them.
 
#57
#57
They also have some pretty nifty little concealment technologies too.

I'm not sure how awesome their invisibility cloak is as of today, but I haven't "seen" much about it as of late...
 
#58
#58
They also have some pretty nifty little concealment technologies too.

I'm not sure how awesome their invisibility cloak is as of today, but I haven't "seen" much about it as of late...

Lol. The premise of an invisibility cloak is funny. Your eyes use light, if the light bends around you and doesn't go to your eyes, then you cannot see at all. Your eyes essentially must be visible to the enemy. Same goes for cameras and stuff, too.
 
#59
#59
Lol. The premise of an invisibility cloak is funny. Your eyes use light, if the light bends around you and doesn't go to your eyes, then you cannot see at all. Your eyes essentially must be visible to the enemy. Same goes for cameras and stuff, too.

Um. What? If you are saying that you'd have to have ghost holes poked out of the cloak in order for you to see, then, um, no, no you wouldn't.

If not, I don't know what you are saying.

But I will say this: Thermals.

Done. Invisibility cloak defeated.
 
#60
#60
obamank.jpg
 
#63
#63
You Barry freaks freak me out sometimes, do you
ever realize that brains have been invented and
that they can actually be used to think with??

I have to admit, dubya was tough on those Koreans
in Iraq.













































Sweet-Complete-Devotion.jpg
 
Last edited:
#64
#64
Evidently someone has already mentioned the UN response.

Pundit Press: UN to Give North Korea MORE Aid after Attack on South Korea



Anyone read Jimmy Carter's article in today's Washington Post (aka Pravda on the Potomac)?

From what I heard is a bit of self agrandizing on his part in negotiations with NK over the last twenty years.

If I recall correctly it was Bill Clinton, Madeline Albright (or should that be Aldull?) and Jimmy 'the nuclear expert' Carter who were responsible for the North Koreans being nuclear capable in the first place.

Jimmy claimed to be a nuclear whiz since he had served on a nuclear submarine, the biggest problem with that lie is that Carter was out of the Navy two years before we even had a nuclear submarine.

Yeah, irking them into lobbing ICBM's at every US ally within reach (and possibly US soil) is a fantastic idea.
 
#65
#65
Yeah, irking them into lobbing ICBM's at every US ally within reach (and possibly US soil) is a fantastic idea.
Appeasing them clearly isn't working. They'll just lay in the weeds for awhile and then when they want something they'll saber rattle and extort the international community again.
 
Last edited:
#66
#66
We should link all aid to NK with some sort of mechanism for openness. Like for every 50k in aid, a NKean teenager gets a computer with three years' unrestricted access to the internet.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#67
#67
Appeasing them clearly isn't working. They'll just lay in the weeds for awhile and then when they want something they'll saber rattle and extort the international community again.

Anything else anybody can come up with could likely end up with them unleashing hell on anything in the region associated with America.

This situation has no solutions that "work."
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#68
#68
We should link all aid to NK with some sort of mechanism for openness. Like for every 50k in aid, a NKean teenager gets a computer with three years' unrestricted access to the internet.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

So he can get sent to a labor camp
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#69
#69
This North Korean website is pure unintentional comedy:

Scroll down to see the FAQ. #4, #17, and #24 are very telling and the question they deemed to be worthy of being at the top of the list is flat out hysterical.

DPRK-FAQ(updated)
 
#73
#73
obamoa.jpg


The important thing about this latest act on the
international diplomacy stage is that dear leader
Obambi be seen by the American public as bing
strong on defense.

Dear leader has dispatched our aircraft carrier,
the USS George Washington, to the area and
frightened the NK not so dear leader, Long Dong
Gone Wrong, who has ordered a black out of the
whole country north of the 38th parallel.

Korean_peninsula_at_night.jpg


On November 12th long Dong revealed a modern
plant with 2,000 brand new centerfuges with
which it is producing enough plutonium to obliterate
Disney Studios.

In a stongly worded communique the son of the NK
leader and heir apparent, Limp Dong, said that the
recently discovered fact that western capitalist pig
scientist had declared Pluto not to be a planet any
more had brought about this enlightened response
from the the world's only truly socialist paradise.

The messege read in part; "If Pluto no planet,
Mickey no mouse and reactionary running dogs
must suffer."

ess_north_korean_138.jpg
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top