508mikey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2011
- Messages
- 60,673
- Likes
- 50,015
The ban also shouldn't have passed, though.
The PAC-12 officials voted 11-1 against the ban, but because their rep to the Division I council was already the one AD (UCLA) that cast the opposite vote, he voted instead in his own interests and thus misrepresented the conference's wishes at the actual vote. The Sunbelt rep did something similar and cast a vote against the conference's wishes.
Instead of the 10-5 for ban to later be enacted, it should actually have been 8-7 against a ban being enacted.
Once that came out publicly (along with the DOJ informally beginning to investigate), the NCAA pretty much had to cancel going through with the ban.
ACC and SEC have lifted their Satelite ban, and are allowed to travel around the country doing them. Stuffs about to get crazy
I am confused there was only 2 conferences that would have changed their vote - that is 8-7 FOR the ban.
Whatever competitive advantage that was there for JH is going to be gone very quickly.
The sad part is that this only really benefits young men in certain areas of the country. Folks acting like this is a big benefit for many don't realize all the action will be in a handful of states. It does nothing for smaller colleges or players in most of the states in the U.S.
ACC and SEC have lifted their Satelite ban, and are allowed to travel around the country doing them. Stuffs about to get crazy
If I recall correctly, one if the factors in the original decision was the threat of the SEC unleashing their resources into satelite camps. I would be shocked if we don't see us and the rest of the SEC go on a natiowide tour of these camps.
I am confused there was only 2 conferences that would have changed their vote - that is 8-7 FOR the ban.